Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] af_mpls: fix undefined reference to ip6_route_output with CONFIG_IPV6=n

[roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>]

On 7/30/15, 7:57 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 06:22 -0700, roopa wrote:
>> On 7/29/15, 10:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:27:39 -0700
>>>
>>>> v4 - v5: Use ipv6_stub_impl.ipv6_dst_lookup as suggested by Hannes
>>> I think this might not work.
>>>
>>> The ipv6_stub pointer is NULL until the ipv6 module is loaded.
>>>
>>> VXLAN can safely call through ipv6_stub->foo() because it _knows_
>>> the
>>> ipv6 module has been loaded, and will not go away, because it is
>>> working with an ipv6 socket.
>>>
>>> You don't have that set of preconditions here, and thus it is pretty
>>> easy to generate a scenerio where ipv6_stub will be NULL at your
>>> call
>>> sites.
>> v4 seems to be a better/safe option in that case. I can resubmit v4 if
>> that is acceptable.
>>
>>> This is starting to get really messy, to be honest.  And we've been
>>> harboring this build failure for several days now.
>>>
>> please revert the commit that introduced the IPV6 dependency. I will
>> resubmit if needed.
>> I don't feel good about the build failure either.
>>
>> Thanks and apologies.
> Of course you have to guard the NULL pointer dereference. Something simple like that will do:
>
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,15 @@ int inet6addr_notifier_call_chain(unsigned long val, void *v)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet6addr_notifier_call_chain);
>   
> -const struct ipv6_stub *ipv6_stub __read_mostly;
> +static int eafnosupport_ipv6_dst_lookup(struct sock *u1, struct dst_entry **u2,
> +                                       struct flowi6 *u3)
> +{
> +       return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> +}
> +
> +const struct ipv6_stub *ipv6_stub __read_mostly = &(struct ipv6_stub){
> +       .ipv6_dst_lookup = eafnosupport_ipv6_dst_lookup,
> +};
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ipv6_stub);
>   
>   /* IPv6 Wildcard Address and Loopback Address defined by RFC2553 */
>
I have submitted a v6 with this. I had a NULL check in my v5 for 
ipv6_stub and i had thought
that should suffice...but was only concerned about ipv6 module unload.
If v6 is no good, i plan to re-post my v4 patch as v7.

thanks.