From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunder, bgx: Add support for ACPI binding.
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:52:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C48DF9.70406@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150807104320.GQ1820@rric.localhost>
On 07.08.2015 12:43, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 07.08.15 10:09:04, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> On 07.08.2015 02:33, David Daney wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> +#else
>>> +
>>> +static int bgx_init_acpi_phy(struct bgx *bgx)
>>> +{
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>>> +
>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_MDIO)
>>>
>>> static int bgx_init_of_phy(struct bgx *bgx)
>>> @@ -882,7 +1010,12 @@ static int bgx_init_of_phy(struct bgx *bgx)
>>>
>>> static int bgx_init_phy(struct bgx *bgx)
>>> {
>>> - return bgx_init_of_phy(bgx);
>>> + int err = bgx_init_of_phy(bgx);
>>> +
>>> + if (err != -ENODEV)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + return bgx_init_acpi_phy(bgx);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> If kernel can work with DT and ACPI (both compiled in), it should take only
>> one path instead of probing DT and ACPI sequentially. How about:
>>
>> @@ -902,10 +925,9 @@ static int bgx_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
>> pci_device_id *ent)
>> bgx_vnic[bgx->bgx_id] = bgx;
>> bgx_get_qlm_mode(bgx);
>>
>> - snprintf(bgx_sel, 5, "bgx%d", bgx->bgx_id);
>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, bgx_sel);
>> - if (np)
>> - bgx_init_of(bgx, np);
>> + err = acpi_disabled ? bgx_init_of_phy(bgx) : bgx_init_acpi_phy(bgx);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto err_enable;
>>
>> bgx_init_hw(bgx);
>
> I would not pollute bgx_probe() with acpi and dt specifics, and instead
> keep bgx_init_phy(). The typical design pattern for this is:
>
> static int bgx_init_phy(struct bgx *bgx)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> if (!acpi_disabled)
> return bgx_init_acpi_phy(bgx);
> #endif
> return bgx_init_of_phy(bgx);
> }
>
> This adds acpi runtime detection (acpi=no), does not call dt code in
> case of acpi, and saves the #else for bgx_init_acpi_phy().
>
I am fine with keeping it in bgx_init_phy(), however we can drop there
#ifdefs since both of bgx_init_{acpi,of}_phy calls have empty stub for
!ACPI and !OF case. Like that:
static int bgx_init_phy(struct bgx *bgx)
{
if (!acpi_disabled)
return bgx_init_acpi_phy(bgx);
else
return bgx_init_of_phy(bgx);
}
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-07 0:33 [PATCH 0/2] net: thunder: Add ACPI support David Daney
2015-08-07 0:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: thunder: Factor out DT specific code in BGX David Daney
2015-08-07 0:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] net, thunder, bgx: Add support for ACPI binding David Daney
2015-08-07 8:09 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-07 10:43 ` Robert Richter
2015-08-07 10:52 ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2015-08-07 11:56 ` Robert Richter
2015-08-07 12:42 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-07 16:40 ` David Daney
2015-08-08 11:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-08-07 14:01 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-07 17:37 ` David Daney
2015-08-07 17:51 ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-08 0:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-08 0:11 ` David Daney
2015-08-08 0:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-05 20:00 ` _DSD standardization note (WAS: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunder, bgx: Add support for ACPI binding.) Jon Masters
2015-09-08 17:17 ` David Daney
2015-08-07 17:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] net, thunder, bgx: Add support for ACPI binding Mark Rutland
2015-08-07 14:54 ` Graeme Gregory
2015-08-07 18:14 ` David Daney
2015-08-08 0:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C48DF9.70406@linaro.org \
--to=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=sgoutham@cavium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).