From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ron Angeles Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: atl1c: add BQL support Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:12:08 -0700 Message-ID: <55CC2728.6020309@gmail.com> References: <55CAE130.8040406@gmail.com> <20150812224020.GA31826@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:35446 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750782AbbHMFMK (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 01:12:10 -0400 Received: by pdrg1 with SMTP id g1so15036327pdr.2 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:12:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150812224020.GA31826@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/12/2015 03:40 PM, Francois Romieu wrote: > Ron Angeles : >> This BQL implementation is mostly derived from its related driver, alx. >> Tested on AR8131 (rev c0) [1969:1063]. Saturated a 100mbps link with 5 >> concurrent runs of netperf. Ping latency dropped from 14ms to 3ms. > > Could you use some time to test the attached experimental stuff as well ? > I only have one of these NICs and it is running on something critical throughout the weekdays. I can try running these when I have time on a weekend. Is there any particular way you would suggest testing? Would an overnight smoke test with netperf suffice? -Ron