From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Victor Kaplansky <victork@redhat.com>, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:43:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D14A62.2060408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439732494-29765-2-git-send-email-victork@redhat.com>
On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
> Clarify general description of the mac, status and
> max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
> vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
> the fields are non valid.
>
> Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two
> different feature flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork@redhat.com>
> ---
> content.tex | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index d989d98..342183b 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -3115,23 +3115,14 @@ were needed.
> \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device configuration layout}
> \label{sec:Device Types / Block Device / Feature bits / Device configuration layout}
>
> -Three driver-read-only configuration fields are currently defined. The \field{mac} address field
> -always exists (though is only valid if VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC is set), and
> -\field{status} only exists if VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is set. Two
> -read-only bits (for the driver) are currently defined for the status field:
> -VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP and VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE.
> +
> +The following configuration fields are currently defined:
>
> \begin{lstlisting}
> #define VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP 1
> #define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE 2
> \end{lstlisting}
>
> -The following driver-read-only field, \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} only exists if
> -VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is set. This field specifies the maximum number
> -of each of transmit and receive virtqueues (receiveq1\ldots receiveqN
> -and transmitq1\ldots transmitqN respectively) that can be configured once VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ
> -is negotiated.
> -
> \begin{lstlisting}
> struct virtio_net_config {
> u8 mac[6];
> @@ -3140,6 +3131,35 @@ struct virtio_net_config {
> };
> \end{lstlisting}
>
> +\field{mac}, \field{status}, \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} are
> +driver-read-only. \field{default_mtu} can also be written
> +by the driver after negotiation.
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +\item [\field{mac}] is MAC address assigned by the device and is valid
> + only if VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC is offered.
> +
> +\item [\field{status}] consists of two driver-read-only status bits:
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +
> +\item VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP is valid if VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is
> + offered.
> +
> +\item VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE is valid if
> + VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE is offered.
> +
> +\end{description}
> +
> +\item [\field{max_virtqueue_pairs}] tells the driver the maximum
> + number of each of virtqueues (receiveq1\ldots receiveqN and
> + transmitq1\ldots transmitqN respectively) that can be configured
> + on the device once VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is negotiated.
> + \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} is valid only if VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is
> + set and can be read by the driver.
> +
Hi:
I don't get the point that adding "can be read by the driver". Looks
like it's hard for hypervisor to detect this?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-16 13:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-net: default_mtu - new conf. field Victor Kaplansky
2015-08-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description Victor Kaplansky
2015-08-17 2:43 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-08-19 11:54 ` Victor Kaplansky
2015-08-20 2:46 ` Jason Wang
2015-08-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-net: add default_mtu configuration field Victor Kaplansky
2015-08-17 3:07 ` Jason Wang
2015-08-19 11:31 ` Victor Kaplansky
2015-08-20 2:48 ` Jason Wang
2015-08-20 19:31 ` Flavio Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D14A62.2060408@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=victork@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).