From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>, network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: mleitner@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] sctp: asconf's process should verify address parameter is in the beginning
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:42:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DE24AD.5090507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4904b1345d0e96667e8608454c225ae038acbbe.1440621325.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
On 08/26/2015 04:35 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> in sctp_process_asconf(), we get address parameter from the beginning of
> the addip params. but we never check if it's really there. if the addr
> param is not there, it still can pass sctp_verify_asconf(), then to be
> handled by sctp_process_asconf(), it will not be safe.
>
> so add a code in sctp_verify_asconf() to check the address parameter is in
> the beginning, or return false to send abort.
>
> v2->v3:
> * put the check in the loop, add the check for multiple address parameters.
Please split the multiple address detection from first address detection.
They are 2 different bugs and each one deserves a separate commit and
changelog.
Thanks
-vlad
> v1->v2:
> * put the check behind the params' length verify.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> index 06320c8..4068fe1 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> @@ -3130,14 +3130,24 @@ bool sctp_verify_asconf(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> case SCTP_PARAM_ERR_CAUSE:
> break;
> case SCTP_PARAM_IPV4_ADDRESS:
> + if (addr_param_seen) {
> + /* peer placed multiple address parameters into
> + * the same asconf. reject it.
> + */
> + return false;
> + }
> if (length != sizeof(sctp_ipv4addr_param_t))
> return false;
> - addr_param_seen = true;
> + if (param.v == addip->addip_hdr.params)
> + addr_param_seen = true;
> break;
> case SCTP_PARAM_IPV6_ADDRESS:
> + if (addr_param_seen)
> + return false;
> if (length != sizeof(sctp_ipv6addr_param_t))
> return false;
> - addr_param_seen = true;
> + if (param.v == addip->addip_hdr.params)
> + addr_param_seen = true;
> break;
> case SCTP_PARAM_ADD_IP:
> case SCTP_PARAM_DEL_IP:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-26 20:35 [PATCH net v3] sctp: asconf's process should verify address parameter is in the beginning Xin Long
2015-08-26 20:42 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2015-08-26 20:59 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-08-26 21:09 ` lucien xin
2015-08-26 21:37 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DE24AD.5090507@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).