From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: lucien xin <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>,
network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@infradead.org>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] sctp: start t5 timer only when peer.rwnd is 0 and local.state is SHUTDOWN_PENDING
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:14:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DF2971.5080009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvbK_eZfJpQtvM_zTyS=3yTuCkdK0RM-zbMbFvUx5L-U9u5jQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/27/2015 10:49 AM, lucien xin wrote:
>>
>> So one potential way is to have peer.rwnd and peer.a_rwnd, where peer.a_rwnd is
>> the window advertised by peer and peer.rwnd and our estimation based on peer.a_rwnd.
>> This way we will always know where we stand.
>>
>> Although I am not sure yet if we want to grow the peer structure any more.
>>
>> Another way is to have an estimate or 0-window probe bit/flags one the send side
>> and set it when we do 0-window probe. This way we'd know that when 0-window probe
>> bit is set, peer returned 0 window.
>>
> I think updating 0-window may happen in sctp_process_init() and
> sctp_outq_sack(),
> I don't think 0-window can be probed, cause unreachable and closing
> window both has
> no reply from peer. but we can update the 0-window bit in those two
> functions. I just do
> not know where there is a available bit we can use if won't change the
> peer structure.
You can ignore INIT as the window will never be 0 (not allowed).
The updates could happen at the end of sctp_outq_sack(). There some spare
bits in peer if you want to go that way.
-vlad
>
>> Just some thoughts.
>> -vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-23 11:30 [PATCH net v2] sctp: start t5 timer only when peer.rwnd is 0 and local.state is SHUTDOWN_PENDING Xin Long
2015-08-24 13:01 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-08-24 18:13 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-24 18:31 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-08-24 18:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-24 19:13 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-08-27 13:19 ` lucien xin
2015-08-27 13:30 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-27 14:49 ` lucien xin
2015-08-27 15:14 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2015-08-27 16:40 ` lucien xin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DF2971.5080009@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).