From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, wangnan0@huawei.com,
hekuang@huawei.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: add support for %s specifier to bpf_trace_printk()
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:06:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DF97E6.9050108@plumgrid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150827.153409.893765406170260565.davem@davemloft.net>
On 8/27/15 3:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:26:59 -0700
>
>> +/* similar to strncpy_from_user() but with extra checks */
>> +static void probe_read_string(char *buf, int size, long unsafe_ptr)
>> +{
>> + char dst[4];
>> + int i = 0;
>> +
>> + size--;
>> + for (;;) {
>> + if (probe_kernel_read(dst, (void *) unsafe_ptr, 4))
>> + break;
>
> I don't think this does the right thing when the string is not a multiple
> of 3 and ends at the last byte of a page that ends a valid region of
> kernel memory.
>
> Seeing this kind of error makes me skeptical to the overall value of
> optimizing this :-/
I've considered the case when first two bytes are valid, but the
other two are in a different page. In such case the probe_read_string()
will trim the string and won't be printing these two valid bytes.
I think that's very rare, so I'm picking higher performance for common
case. The strings over > 64 bytes also will be trimmed to 64.
It's a debugging facility, so I felt that's ok.
Fair or you still think it should be per byte copy?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 6:26 [PATCH net-next] bpf: add support for %s specifier to bpf_trace_printk() Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-27 22:34 ` David Miller
2015-08-27 23:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2015-08-27 23:20 ` David Miller
2015-08-27 23:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-28 1:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DF97E6.9050108@plumgrid.com \
--to=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).