netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, wangnan0@huawei.com,
	hekuang@huawei.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: add support for %s specifier to bpf_trace_printk()
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:06:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DF97E6.9050108@plumgrid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150827.153409.893765406170260565.davem@davemloft.net>

On 8/27/15 3:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:26:59 -0700
>
>> +/* similar to strncpy_from_user() but with extra checks */
>> +static void probe_read_string(char *buf, int size, long unsafe_ptr)
>> +{
>> +	char dst[4];
>> +	int i = 0;
>> +
>> +	size--;
>> +	for (;;) {
>> +		if (probe_kernel_read(dst, (void *) unsafe_ptr, 4))
>> +			break;
>
> I don't think this does the right thing when the string is not a multiple
> of 3 and ends at the last byte of a page that ends a valid region of
> kernel memory.
>
> Seeing this kind of error makes me skeptical to the overall value of
> optimizing this :-/

I've considered the case when first two bytes are valid, but the
other two are in a different page. In such case the probe_read_string()
will trim the string and won't be printing these two valid bytes.
I think that's very rare, so I'm picking higher performance for common
case. The strings over > 64 bytes also will be trimmed to 64.
It's a debugging facility, so I felt that's ok.
Fair or you still think it should be per byte copy?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-27 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-27  6:26 [PATCH net-next] bpf: add support for %s specifier to bpf_trace_printk() Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-27 22:34 ` David Miller
2015-08-27 23:06   ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2015-08-27 23:20     ` David Miller
2015-08-27 23:43       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-28  1:58         ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55DF97E6.9050108@plumgrid.com \
    --to=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).