netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	<ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1 net] xen-netback: require fewer guest Rx slots when not using GSO
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:30:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F7F339.4050501@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150909.123459.1956039261743477106.davem@davemloft.net>

On 09/09/15 20:34, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:25:14 +0100
> 
>> Commit f48da8b14d04ca87ffcffe68829afd45f926ec6a (xen-netback: fix
>> unlimited guest Rx internal queue and carrier flapping) introduced a
>> regression.
>>
>> The PV frontend in IPXE only places 4 requests on the guest Rx ring.
>> Since netback required at least (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1) slots, IPXE could
>> not receive any packets.
>>
>> a) If GSO is not enabled on the VIF, fewer guest Rx slots are required
>>    for the largest possible packet.  Calculate the required slots
>>    based on the maximum GSO size or the MTU.
>>
>>    This calculation of the number of required slots relies on
>>    1650d5455bd2 (xen-netback: always fully coalesce guest Rx packets)
>>    which present in 4.0-rc1 and later.
>>
>> b) Reduce the Rx stall detection to checking for at least one
>>    available Rx request.  This is fine since we're predominately
>>    concerned with detecting interfaces which are down and thus have
>>    zero available Rx requests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks David.

Hi David,

This is causing regressions with certain frontend drivers.  Can you drop
it, please?

Apologies for posting the patch before running it through the full set
of internal testing.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-15 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-08 13:25 [PATCHv1 net] xen-netback: require fewer guest Rx slots when not using GSO David Vrabel
2015-09-09 10:41 ` Wei Liu
2015-09-09 19:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-10  9:41   ` David Vrabel
2015-09-09 19:34 ` David Miller
2015-09-15 10:30   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-09-15 17:15     ` [Xen-devel] " David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F7F339.4050501@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).