From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: "Charles (Chas) Williams" <3chas3@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: always set num queues if possible
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:59:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F7FA2D.5040701@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442266096.3494.15.camel@gmail.com>
On 14/09/15 22:28, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
> The xen store preserves this information across module invocations.
> If you insmod netfront with two queues and later insmod again with one
> queue, the backend will still believe you asked for two queues.
Can you rewrite the commit message to be clearer?
"If netfront connects with 2 (or more) queues and then reconnects with
only 1 queue it fails to delete or rewrite the multi-queue-num-queues
key and netback will try to use the wrong number of queues.
Always write the num-queues field if the backend has multi-queue support."
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> @@ -1819,11 +1819,7 @@ again:
> goto destroy_ring;
> }
>
> - if (num_queues == 1) {
> - err = write_queue_xenstore_keys(&info->queues[0], &xbt, 0); /* flat */
> - if (err)
> - goto abort_transaction_no_dev_fatal;
> - } else {
> + if (xenbus_exists(xbt, dev->nodename, "multi-queue-num-queues")) {
> /* Write the number of queues */
> err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "multi-queue-num-queues",
> "%u", num_queues);
Isn't this broken? It looks like it won't write the
multi-queue-num-queues key the first time around.
It think this should be conditional on multi-queue-max-queues existing
(which is written by the backend if multi-queue is supported).
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 21:28 [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: always set num queues if possible Charles (Chas) Williams
2015-09-15 10:59 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-09-15 14:37 ` [Xen-devel] " Charles (Chas) Williams
2015-09-16 20:28 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Charles (Chas) Williams
2015-09-21 4:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F7FA2D.5040701@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).