From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
To: open list: TI NETCP ETHERNET DRIVER <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, ;
Subject: netdev: question on ndo_set_rx_mode() API
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:07:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FC44CF.8050001@ti.com> (raw)
Hello Netdev experts,
I am seeing an issue with netcp driver that has a mutex lock/unlock()
call. When kernel hack debug options are enabled, I see a warning that
this function is taking a mutex that can sleep and is not allowed. I am
working to fix this. Looking at other drivers, I see many drivers such
as e1000_main.c are not holding any driver specific lock as part of the
API implementation. So my first attempt is to remove the mutex. But
wondering what kind of synchronization is required in this API to run it
properly on an SMP kernel. Based on my search following files are
calling dev_change_flags() which in turn calls ndo_set_rx_mode()
Set-1
======
net/ipv4/devinet.c
net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
net/core/dev_ioctl.c
Set-2
=====
net/8021q/vlan.c
net/core/rtnetlink.c
Set-1 seems to call this with rtnl_lock (mutex) held. So there is
already protection between processes that calls this function and driver
doesn't need to provide any explicit synchronization. Is this correct?
For Set-2, I can't figure out in what context this is calling this API
Can someone help me understand this?
However I see below.
Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt explains,
ndo_set_rx_mode:
Synchronization: netif_addr_lock spinlock.
Context: BHs disabled
So is there any synchronization required from the driver perspective? If
yes, what kind of synchronization is needed? Thanks in advance for your
response.
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-18 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 17:07 Murali Karicheri [this message]
2015-09-21 17:15 ` netdev: question on ndo_set_rx_mode() API Murali Karicheri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FC44CF.8050001@ti.com \
--to=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).