From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=C5=BBenczykowski?= <zenczykowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iputils: ping by mark
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:57:17 -0700
Message-ID: <55a4f86e0910181557r3900939xc05a5ba1c1ffb0a4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1255381558.5406.33.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
	 <7e84ed60910161405i2ce46053m9858b7f1c086e6b7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1255782635.11213.7.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
	 <55a4f86e0910171154v460146a8m1360fac71f9ddac8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1255820692.4815.2.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
	 <1255822485.4815.15.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
	 <55a4f86e0910171846w45dda0e9w86f570b087c1543d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1255865866.4815.21.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Rob.Townley@gmail.com, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com ([209.85.220.218]:49241 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f218.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755070AbZJRW5O (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:57:14 -0400
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so4409871fxm.37
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1255865866.4815.21.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

> It works fine with tcp and udp and to emphasize: i have never seen it
> broken.

Really? Ok, so we're doing something very differently...
My testing was done on a 2.6.26 kernel (but AFAICT from browsing the
code, the behaviour in question should not have changed till the last
few patches posted in the last 2-3 weeks).