netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg
	<sagig-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org,
	ssantosh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] RDS: connection scalability and performance improvements
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:02:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56002A03.5060305@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FE7060.6010205-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>

On 9/20/2015 1:37 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 9/20/2015 2:04 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> This series addresses RDS connection bottlenecks on massive workloads and
>> improve the RDMA performance almost by 3X. RDS TCP also gets a small gain
>> of about 12%.
>>
>> RDS is being used in massive systems with high scalability where several
>> hundred thousand end points and tens of thousands of local processes
>> are operating in tens of thousand sockets. Being RC(reliable connection),
>> socket bind and release happens very often and any inefficiencies in
>> bind hash look ups hurts the overall system performance. RDS bin
>> hash-table
>> uses global spin-lock which is the biggest bottleneck. To make matter
>> worst,
>> it uses rcu inside global lock for hash buckets.
>> This is being addressed by simply using per bucket rw lock which makes
>> the
>> locking simple and very efficient. The hash table size is also scaled up
>> accordingly.
>>
>> For RDS RDMA improvement, the completion handling is revamped so that we
>> can do batch completions. Both send and receive completion handlers are
>> split logically to achieve the same. RDS 8K messages being one of the
>> key usecase, mr pool is adapted to have the 8K mrs along with default 1M
>> mrs. And while doing this, few fixes and couple of bottlenecks seen with
>> rds_sendmsg() are addressed.
>
> Hi Santosh,
>
> I think that can get a more effective code review if you CC the
> Linux-rdma mailing list.
>
I will do that from next time. Thanks Sagi !!

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-21 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-19 23:04 [PATCH 00/15] RDS: connection scalability and performance improvements Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 01/15] RDS: use kfree_rcu in rds_ib_remove_ipaddr Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 02/15] RDS: make socket bind/release locking scheme simple and more efficient Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 03/15] RDS: fix rds_sock reference bug while doing bind Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 04/15] RDS: Use per-bucket rw lock for bind hash-table Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-21  8:31   ` David Laight
2015-09-21 15:52     ` santosh shilimkar
2015-09-21 23:05   ` David Miller
2015-09-21 23:55     ` santosh shilimkar
2015-09-23 18:06       ` santosh shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 06/15] RDS: defer the over_batch work to send worker Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 07/15] RDS: use rds_send_xmit() state instead of RDS_LL_SEND_FULL Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 08/15] RDS: ack more receive completions to improve performance Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 09/15] RDS: split send completion handling and do batch ack Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 10/15] RDS: handle rds_ibdev release case instead of crashing the kernel Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 11/15] RDS: fix the rds_ib_fmr_wq kick call Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 12/15] RDS: use already available pool handle from ibmr Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 13/15] RDS: mark rds_ib_fmr_wq static Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 14/15] RDS: use max_mr from HCA caps than max_fmr Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-19 23:04 ` [PATCH 15/15] RDS: split mr pool to improve 8K messages performance Santosh Shilimkar
2015-09-20  8:37 ` [PATCH 00/15] RDS: connection scalability and performance improvements Sagi Grimberg
     [not found]   ` <55FE7060.6010205-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-21 16:02     ` santosh shilimkar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56002A03.5060305@oracle.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sagig-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ssantosh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).