From: Arend van Spriel <arend-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu-zZGIbrA41Td8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>,
Brett Rudley <brudley-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin"
<frankyl-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts
<pieterpg-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"John W. Linville"
<linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
Markus Elfring
<elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"brcm80211-dev-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org"
<brcm80211-dev-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in brcmfmac driver
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5618C15F.2030706@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17EC94B0A072C34B8DCF0D30AD16044A02874785-9lrffkYxhwTt6d3pZDjeaEtBU8KWyXPq@public.gmane.org>
On 10/09/2015 02:35 AM, Kosuke Tatsukawa wrote:
> brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake() seems to be missing a memory barrier
> which might cause the waker to not notice the waiter and miss sending a
> wake_up as in the following figure.
>
> brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wait
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> if (waitqueue_active(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait))
> /* The CPU might reorder the test for
> the waitqueue up here, before
> prior writes complete */
> /* wait_event_timeout */
> /* __wait_event_timeout */
> /* ___wait_event */
> prepare_to_wait_event(&wq, &__wait,
> state);
> if (msgbuf->ctl_completed)
> ...
> msgbuf->ctl_completed = true;
> schedule_timeout(__ret))
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There are three other place in drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/
> which have similar code. The attached patch removes the call to
> waitqueue_active() leaving just wake_up() behind. This fixes the
> problem because the call to spin_lock_irqsave() in wake_up() will be an
> ACQUIRE operation.
>
> I found this issue when I was looking through the linux source code
> for places calling waitqueue_active() before wake_up*(), but without
> preceding memory barriers, after sending a patch to fix a similar
> issue in drivers/tty/n_tty.c (Details about the original issue can be
> found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/28/849).
I prefer to add proper barriers instead of removing waitqueue_active()
check. We will review your patch and submit it through our upstream process.
Regards,
Arend
> Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu-zZGIbrA41Td8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c | 3 +--
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c | 3 +--
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> index 7b2136c..648151e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> @@ -473,8 +473,7 @@ static int brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wait(struct brcmf_msgbuf *msgbuf)
> static void brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake(struct brcmf_msgbuf *msgbuf)
> {
> msgbuf->ctl_completed = true;
> - if (waitqueue_active(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait))
> - wake_up(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait);
> + wake_up(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait);
> }
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index f990e3d..332c4c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_dcmd_resp_wait(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint *condition,
>
> static int brcmf_sdio_dcmd_resp_wake(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> {
> - if (waitqueue_active(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait))
> - wake_up_interruptible(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait);
> + wake_up_interruptible(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -2110,8 +2109,7 @@ static uint brcmf_sdio_readframes(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint maxframes)
> static void
> brcmf_sdio_wait_event_wakeup(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> {
> - if (waitqueue_active(&bus->ctrl_wait))
> - wake_up_interruptible(&bus->ctrl_wait);
> + wake_up_interruptible(&bus->ctrl_wait);
> return;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> index daba86d..7f5889c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> @@ -184,8 +184,7 @@ static int brcmf_usb_ioctl_resp_wait(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
>
> static void brcmf_usb_ioctl_resp_wake(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
> {
> - if (waitqueue_active(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait))
> - wake_up(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait);
> + wake_up(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait);
> }
>
> static void
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-10 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-09 0:35 [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in brcmfmac driver Kosuke Tatsukawa
2015-10-09 19:44 ` Arend van Spriel
[not found] ` <17EC94B0A072C34B8DCF0D30AD16044A02874785-9lrffkYxhwTt6d3pZDjeaEtBU8KWyXPq@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-10 7:42 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5618C15F.2030706@broadcom.com \
--to=arend-dy08kvg/lbpwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=brudley-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=frankyl-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=meuleman-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pieterpg-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tatsu-zZGIbrA41Td8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).