From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>, Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 2/7] switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:40:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561C8B39.20604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4R7bCm+jOjhMH7wucCFhNd55Do_dJpqzixrtKZbCM4vG1dKw@mail.gmail.com>
On 15-10-12 07:52 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>>
>> Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL)
>> or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later.
>>
>> This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation
>> status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is
>> not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
>> net/bridge/br_stp.c | 3 +-
>> net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> index d2879f2..6b109e4 100644
>> --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
>> +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>
>> #define SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE BIT(0)
>> #define SWITCHDEV_F_SKIP_EOPNOTSUPP BIT(1)
>> +#define SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER BIT(2)
>>
>> struct switchdev_trans_item {
>> struct list_head list;
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
>> index db6d243de..80c34d7 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
>> @@ -41,13 +41,14 @@ void br_set_state(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned int state)
>> {
>> struct switchdev_attr attr = {
>> .id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE,
>> + .flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER,
>> .u.stp_state = state,
>> };
>> int err;
>>
>> p->state = state;
>> err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
>> - if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + if (err)
>
> This looks like a problem as now all other non-switchdev ports will
> get an WARN in the log when STP state changes. We should only WARN if
> there was an err and the err is not -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
>> br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload STP state on port %u(%s)\n",
>> (unsigned int) p->port_no, p->dev->name);
>> }
>
> <snip>
>
>> struct switchdev_attr_set_work {
>> struct work_struct work;
>> struct net_device *dev;
>> @@ -183,14 +226,17 @@ static void switchdev_port_attr_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> struct switchdev_attr_set_work *asw =
>> container_of(work, struct switchdev_attr_set_work, work);
>> + bool rtnl_locked = rtnl_is_locked();
>> int err;
>>
>> - rtnl_lock();
>> - err = switchdev_port_attr_set(asw->dev, &asw->attr);
>> + if (!rtnl_locked)
>> + rtnl_lock();
>
> I'm not following this change. If someone else has rtnl_lock, we'll
> not wait to grab it here ourselves, and proceed as if we have the
> lock. But what if that someone else releases the lock in the middle
> of us doing switchdev_port_attr_set_now? Seems we want to
> unconditionally wait and grab the lock. We need to block anything
> from moving while we do the attr set.
>
Also an additional race between setting rtnl_locked and the if stmt
and then grabbing the lock. There seems to be a something of pattern
around this where other subsystems use a rtnl_trylock and if it fails
do a restart/re-queue operation to retry. Looks like how you handle
it in the team driver at least.
>> + err = switchdev_port_attr_set_now(asw->dev, &asw->attr);
>> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> netdev_err(asw->dev, "failed (err=%d) to set attribute (id=%d)\n",
>> err, asw->attr.id);
>> - rtnl_unlock();
>> + if (!rtnl_locked)
>> + rtnl_unlock();
>>
>> dev_put(asw->dev);
>> kfree(work);
>> @@ -211,7 +257,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_attr_set_defer(struct net_device *dev,
>> asw->dev = dev;
>> memcpy(&asw->attr, attr, sizeof(asw->attr));
>>
>> - schedule_work(&asw->work);
>> + queue_work(switchdev_wq, &asw->work);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 17:54 [patch net-next v4 0/7] switchdev: change locking Jiri Pirko
2015-10-12 17:54 ` [patch net-next v4 1/7] switchdev: introduce switchdev workqueue Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 3:01 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-12 18:03 ` [patch net-next v4 2/7] switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Jiri Pirko
2015-10-12 18:03 ` [patch net-next v4 3/7] switchdev: remove pointers from switchdev objects Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 3:01 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-13 4:44 ` John Fastabend
2015-10-12 18:03 ` [patch net-next v4 4/7] switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 3:08 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-12 18:03 ` [patch net-next v4 5/7] bridge: defer switchdev fdb del call in fdb_del_external_learn Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 3:28 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-13 3:31 ` John Fastabend
2015-10-13 4:19 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-13 5:16 ` John Fastabend
2015-10-13 6:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 6:46 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-12 18:03 ` [patch net-next v4 6/7] rocker: remove nowait from switchdev callbacks Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 4:02 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-13 6:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 6:55 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-12 18:03 ` [patch net-next v4 7/7] switchdev: assert rtnl mutex when going over lower netdevs Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 2:52 ` [patch net-next v4 2/7] switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Scott Feldman
2015-10-13 4:40 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2015-10-13 5:45 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 5:48 ` John Fastabend
2015-10-13 5:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 6:03 ` John Fastabend
2015-10-13 6:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 6:53 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-13 7:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13 14:07 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-13 14:39 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561C8B39.20604@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eladr@mellanox.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).