From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Daney Subject: Re: SoCFPGA ethernet broken Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:47:05 -0700 Message-ID: <56212A09.5080206@caviumnetworks.com> References: <562005AD.8020903@opensource.altera.com> <56200BD7.8020505@gmail.com> <56200E15.9080603@caviumnetworks.com> <56201158.8040806@opensource.altera.com> <56201AE7.2020103@gmail.com> <20151016033143.GA28207@lunn.ch> <20151016150345.GI10146@lunn.ch> <20151016155644.GJ10146@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , , , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Andrew Lunn , Dinh Nguyen , Florian Fainelli Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151016155644.GJ10146@lunn.ch> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 10/16/2015 08:56 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> So I think I'll move to inspect what Florian had suggested, and that was to look >> at: drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c::stmmac_mdio_register > > I have a suspicion. If you look at the phy driver it does: > > static int ksz9021_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev) > { > const struct device *dev = &phydev->dev; > const struct device_node *of_node = dev->of_node; > > if (!of_node && dev->parent->of_node) > of_node = dev->parent->of_node; > Maybe we need to walk up the hierarchy. Perhaps something like: const struct device *dev_walker; dev_walker = &phydev->dev; do { of_node = dev_walker->of_node; dev_walker = dev_walker->parent; } while (!of_node && dev_walker); An alternative would be to assign the bus the same of_node as the bus parent. If either approach works, you can add: Acked-by: David Daney to the patch that implements it. > > In your case, you don't have a phy node in your device tree, so of_node > is NULL. So it looks in the parent device. > > phylib: Make PHYs children of their MDIO bus, not the bus' parent. > > changed what the parent is. It is now the mdio device. Before, i > suspect it was the MAC. Hence it found your properties in the MAC > node. > > What i think you might want to do is change this code. Rather than > look a dev->parent->of_node; you might want > phydev->attached_dev->dev->of_node. > > This assumes the phy has been attached to the MAC. I've no idea of the > ordering, so maybe it has not been attached yet? > > dp83867.c has similar code. However quick grep did not find any > mainline users with properties in the MAC node. If that is true, i > would suggest removing the code looking in the parent for that phy > driver. > > Andrew >