From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>, Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:49:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56286ACD.3060604@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445468283-4592-1-git-send-email-ast@kernel.org>
After applying this patch I'm unable to use perf passing perf_event
again like this:
# perf record -a -e evt=cycles -e
./test_config_map.c/maps.pmu_map.event=evt/ --exclude-perf ls
With -v it output:
...
adding perf_bpf_probe:func_write
adding perf_bpf_probe:func_write to 0x367d6a0
add bpf event perf_bpf_probe:func_write_return and attach bpf program 6
adding perf_bpf_probe:func_write_return
adding perf_bpf_probe:func_write_return to 0x3a7fc40
mmap size 528384B
ERROR: failed to insert value to pmu_map[0]
ERROR: Apply config to BPF failed: Invalid option for map, add -v to see
detail
Opening /sys/kernel/debug/tracing//kprobe_events write=
...
Looks like perf sets attr.inherit for cycles? I'll look into this problem.
Thank you.
On 2015/10/22 6:58, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Fix safety checks for bpf_perf_event_read():
> - only non-inherited events can be added to perf_event_array map
> (do this check statically at map insertion time)
> - dynamically check that event is local and !pmu->count
> Otherwise buggy bpf program can cause kernel splat.
>
> Fixes: 35578d798400 ("bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> ---
> v1->v2: fix compile in case of !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
>
> This patch is on top of
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/533585/
> to avoid conflicts.
> Even in the worst case the crash is not possible.
> Only warn_on_once, so imo net-next is ok.
>
> kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 9 +++++----
> kernel/events/core.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> index e3cfe46b074f..75529cc94304 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> @@ -294,10 +294,11 @@ static void *perf_event_fd_array_get_ptr(struct bpf_map *map, int fd)
> if (IS_ERR(attr))
> return (void *)attr;
>
> - if (attr->type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> - !(attr->type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
> - attr->config == PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT) &&
> - attr->type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) {
> + if ((attr->type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> + !(attr->type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
> + attr->config == PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT) &&
> + attr->type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) ||
> + attr->inherit) {
> perf_event_release_kernel(event);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 64754bfecd70..0b6333265872 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -3258,7 +3258,7 @@ static inline u64 perf_event_count(struct perf_event *event)
> u64 perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> - u64 val;
> + u64 val = -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> * Disabling interrupts avoids all counter scheduling (context
> @@ -3267,12 +3267,14 @@ u64 perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event)
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> /* If this is a per-task event, it must be for current */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE((event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK) &&
> - event->hw.target != current);
> + if ((event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK) &&
> + event->hw.target != current)
> + goto out;
>
> /* If this is a per-CPU event, it must be for this CPU */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK) &&
> - event->cpu != smp_processor_id());
> + if (!(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK) &&
> + event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
> + goto out;
>
> /*
> * It must not be an event with inherit set, we cannot read
> @@ -3284,7 +3286,8 @@ u64 perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event)
> * It must not have a pmu::count method, those are not
> * NMI safe.
> */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(event->pmu->count);
> + if (event->pmu->count)
> + goto out;
>
> /*
> * If the event is currently on this CPU, its either a per-task event,
> @@ -3295,6 +3298,7 @@ u64 perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event)
> event->pmu->read(event);
>
> val = local64_read(&event->count);
> +out:
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> return val;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 22:58 [PATCH v2 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-22 4:49 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2015-10-22 5:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-22 5:30 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-22 5:31 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-22 6:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-22 7:39 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-22 15:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-22 12:30 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-22 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-22 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-22 15:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56286ACD.3060604@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiakaixu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).