From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>, Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:21:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56299992.8040002@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445559014-4667-1-git-send-email-ast@kernel.org>
On 2015/10/23 8:10, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Fix safety checks for bpf_perf_event_read():
> - only non-inherited events can be added to perf_event_array map
> (do this check statically at map insertion time)
> - dynamically check that event is local and !pmu->count
> Otherwise buggy bpf program can cause kernel splat.
>
> Also fix error path after perf_event_attrs()
> and remove redundant 'extern'.
>
> Fixes: 35578d798400 ("bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> . refactor checks based on Wangnan's and Peter's feedback
> while refactoring realized that these two issues need fixes as well:
> . fix perf_event_attrs() error path
> . remove redundant extern
>
> v1->v2: fix compile in case of !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
>
> Even in the worst case the crash is not possible.
> Only warn_on_once, so imo net-next is ok.
>
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 -
> kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 7 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index e3a51b74e275..75718fa28260 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -194,7 +194,6 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_delete_elem_proto;
>
> -extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_tail_call_proto;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> index e3cfe46b074f..3f4c99e06c6b 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> @@ -292,16 +292,23 @@ static void *perf_event_fd_array_get_ptr(struct bpf_map *map, int fd)
>
> attr = perf_event_attrs(event);
> if (IS_ERR(attr))
> - return (void *)attr;
> + goto err;
>
> - if (attr->type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> - !(attr->type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
> - attr->config == PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT) &&
> - attr->type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) {
> - perf_event_release_kernel(event);
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - }
> - return event;
> + if (attr->inherit)
> + goto err;
> +
Since Peter suggest it is pointless for a system-wide perf_event
has inherit bit set [1], I think it should be safe to enable
system-wide perf_event pass this check?
I'll check code to make sure.
[1]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151022124142.GQ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
> + if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_RAW)
> + return event;
> +
> + if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
> + return event;
> +
> + if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
> + attr->config == PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT)
> + return event;
> +err:
> + perf_event_release_kernel(event);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> static void perf_event_fd_array_put_ptr(void *ptr)
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 47febbe7998e..003df3887287 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ static u64 bpf_perf_event_read(u64 r1, u64 index, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
> if (!event)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /* make sure event is local and doesn't have pmu::count */
> + if (event->oncpu != smp_processor_id() ||
> + event->pmu->count)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /*
> * we don't know if the function is run successfully by the
> * return value. It can be judged in other places, such as
> @@ -207,7 +212,7 @@ static u64 bpf_perf_event_read(u64 r1, u64 index, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
> return perf_event_read_local(event);
> }
>
> -const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_proto = {
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_proto = {
> .func = bpf_perf_event_read,
> .gpl_only = false,
> .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-23 0:10 [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 2:21 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2015-10-23 2:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 3:47 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-23 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-23 14:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-25 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-25 16:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-26 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-26 12:54 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-26 21:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-27 4:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56299992.8040002@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiakaixu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).