From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:27:26 -0700 Message-ID: <562E000E.9080705@plumgrid.com> References: <1445396556-4854-1-git-send-email-ast@kernel.org> <1445396556-4854-3-git-send-email-ast@kernel.org> <20151023143943.GC17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <562A4BE8.2060603@plumgrid.com> <20151023164223.GE17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <562A6D80.6000208@plumgrid.com> <562D860B.2060008@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , He Kuang , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: "Wangnan (F)" , Peter Zijlstra Return-path: In-Reply-To: <562D860B.2060008@huawei.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 10/25/15 6:46 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote: > Can we (or have we already) setup some rules for licensing? Which part > should be GPL? Who has the response to decide it? in my mind the rules were set long ago. See my other email.