From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Armstrong Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:56:18 +0100 Message-ID: <5630D402.8010006@baylibre.com> References: <562F8ED7.2000804@baylibre.com> <562F9AAB.8090202@gmail.com> <562F9BB1.8090700@baylibre.com> <20151027165932.GA21799@ketchup.mtl.sfl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Lunn , Guenter Roeck , Fabian Frederick , Pavel Nakonechny , Joe Perches , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frode Isaksen To: Vivien Didelot Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:34879 "EHLO mail-wm0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965631AbbJ1N4Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:56:24 -0400 Received: by wmll128 with SMTP id l128so7820992wml.0 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:56:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151027165932.GA21799@ketchup.mtl.sfl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/27/2015 05:59 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: > On Oct. Tuesday 27 (44) 04:43 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> >> Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch. >> >> I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie with >> your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code. >> >> Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this. > > So this patch must be part of your RFC for module removal instead of > this patchset. > > Thanks, > -v > Vivien, Florian, Thanks for the review, I will integrate it in the other RFC patchset with the correct Signed-off-by tag. Neil