public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
To: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
	Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<woojung.huh@microchip.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	<andrew@lunn.ch>, <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	<f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>, <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v1 01/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add the posix clock support
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:56:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5639053.DvuYhMxLoT@n95hx1g2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALs4sv19Efi0oKVqRqRFtF2SCr6Phejh4RFvuRN1UCkdvcKJeg@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, 28 November 2022, 15:49:33 CET, Pavan Chebbi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 4:03 PM Arun Ramadoss
> <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp_reg.h b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp_reg.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e578a0006ecf
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp_reg.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/* Microchip KSZ PTP register definitions
> > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Microchip Technology Inc.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __KSZ_PTP_REGS_H
> > +#define __KSZ_PTP_REGS_H
> > +
> > +/* 5 - PTP Clock */
> > +#define REG_PTP_CLK_CTRL               0x0500
> > +
> > +#define PTP_STEP_ADJ                   BIT(6)
> > +#define PTP_STEP_DIR                   BIT(5)
> > +#define PTP_READ_TIME                  BIT(4)
> > +#define PTP_LOAD_TIME                  BIT(3)
> 
> PTP_WRITE_TIME sounds more intuitive than PTP_LOAD_TIME?
PTP_LOAD_TIME has been derived from the data sheet:

-------------8<--------------
PTP Clock Load
--------------
Setting this bit will cause the PTP clock to be loaded with the time value in
registers 0x0502 to 0x050B.
------------->8--------------

I would also prefer PTP_WRITE_TIME. But is it ok to deviate from data sheet?

> Also I see that all the #defines are introduced in this patch, some of
> which are used later. It is a good idea to introduce the #defines in
> the same patches where they are being used for the first time.
> I will be looking at the entire series but am responding to this now.
> 
> > +#define PTP_CLK_ADJ_ENABLE             BIT(2)
> > +#define PTP_CLK_ENABLE                 BIT(1)
> > +#define PTP_CLK_RESET                  BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define REG_PTP_RTC_SUB_NANOSEC__2     0x0502
> > +
> > +#define PTP_RTC_SUB_NANOSEC_M          0x0007
> > +#define PTP_RTC_0NS                    0x00
> > +
> > +#define REG_PTP_RTC_NANOSEC            0x0504
> > +#define REG_PTP_RTC_NANOSEC_H          0x0504
> > +#define REG_PTP_RTC_NANOSEC_L          0x0506
> > +
> > +#define REG_PTP_RTC_SEC                        0x0508
> > +#define REG_PTP_RTC_SEC_H              0x0508
> > +#define REG_PTP_RTC_SEC_L              0x050A
> > +
> > +#define REG_PTP_SUBNANOSEC_RATE                0x050C
> > +#define REG_PTP_SUBNANOSEC_RATE_H      0x050C
> > +#define PTP_SUBNANOSEC_M               0x3FFFFFFF
> > +
> > +#define PTP_RATE_DIR                   BIT(31)
> > +#define PTP_TMP_RATE_ENABLE            BIT(30)
> > +
> > +#define REG_PTP_SUBNANOSEC_RATE_L      0x050E
> > +
> > +#define REG_PTP_RATE_DURATION          0x0510
> > +#define REG_PTP_RATE_DURATION_H                0x0510
> > +#define REG_PTP_RATE_DURATION_L                0x0512
> > +
> > +#define REG_PTP_MSG_CONF1              0x0514
> > +
> > +#define PTP_802_1AS                    BIT(7)
> > +#define PTP_ENABLE                     BIT(6)
> > +#define PTP_ETH_ENABLE                 BIT(5)
> > +#define PTP_IPV4_UDP_ENABLE            BIT(4)
> > +#define PTP_IPV6_UDP_ENABLE            BIT(3)
> > +#define PTP_TC_P2P                     BIT(2)
> > +#define PTP_MASTER                     BIT(1)
> > +#define PTP_1STEP                      BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#endif
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-28 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-28 10:32 [Patch net-next v1 00/12] net: dsa: microchip: add PTP support for KSZ9563/KSZ8563 and LAN937x Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 01/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add the posix clock support Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-28 14:49   ` Pavan Chebbi
2022-11-28 14:56     ` Christian Eggers [this message]
2022-11-30 23:05       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-30  4:53     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-12-01  0:17   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-01 10:01     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 02/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: Initial hardware time stamping support Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-29  8:49   ` Pavan Chebbi
2022-11-30  4:32     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-12-01  0:39   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-01 10:17     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 03/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add 4 bytes in tail tag when ptp enabled Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-01  0:52   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-01 10:56     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 04/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: Manipulating absolute time using ptp hw clock Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-29  8:43   ` Pavan Chebbi
2022-11-30  4:22     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-30  6:11       ` Pavan Chebbi
2022-12-01  1:04   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-02  9:40     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 05/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: enable interrupt for timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 06/12] net: ptp: add helper for one-step P2P clocks Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 07/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add packet reception timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-29  0:43   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 08/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add packet transmission timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 09/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: move pdelay_rsp correction field to tail tag Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 10/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add 2 step timestamping for LAN937x Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 11/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add periodic output signal Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-29  8:53   ` Pavan Chebbi
2022-11-29  9:57     ` Pavan Chebbi
2022-11-30  4:48       ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-30  4:41     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-28 10:32 ` [Patch net-next v1 12/12] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add support for perout programmable pins Arun Ramadoss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5639053.DvuYhMxLoT@n95hx1g2 \
    --to=ceggers@arri.de \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox