From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_eth: merge sh_eth_free_dma_buffer() into
 sh_eth_ring_free()
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:53:24 +0300
Message-ID: <563B5144.8050800@cogentembedded.com>
References: <6672379.kyQ5eFYq8y@wasted.cogentembedded.com>
 <20151104.205939.1680085474215420643.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151104.205939.1680085474215420643.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Hello.

On 11/5/2015 4:59 AM, David Miller wrote:

>> While the ring allocation is done by a single function, sh_eth_ring_init(),
>> the ring deallocation was split into two functions (almost always called
>> one after the other) for no good reason. Merge  sh_eth_free_dma_buffer()
>> into sh_eth_ring_free() which allows us  to save space not only on the
>> direct calls  of the former function but also on the sh_eth_ring_init()'s
>> simplified error path...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>
> Applied.

    Hum, I'm seeing both patches in the net.git repo, while they were  clearly 
targeted to net-next.git... Did you really consider these 2 patches fixes?

MBR, Sergei