From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: linux-next network throughput performance regression Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:30:08 -0700 Message-ID: <563D1BE0.2070107@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <563D1180.60206@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , KY Srinivasan , Haiyang Zhang To: Simon Xiao , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:34761 "EHLO mail-io0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966140AbbKFVaL (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:30:11 -0500 Received: by iody8 with SMTP id y8so135126296iod.1 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:30:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/6/15 2:18 PM, Simon Xiao wrote: > The .config file used to build linux-next kernel is attached to this mail. Thanks. Failed to notice this on the first response; my brain filled in. Why linux-next tree? Can you try net-next which is more relevant for this mailing list, post the top commit id and config file used?