netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:21:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5670A068.3040602@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450178464-27721-6-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>

On 12/15/2015 12:21 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
...
> +/* Called from syscall, and the code is borrowed from blk_mq */
> +static int htab_pre_alloc_elems(struct bpf_htab *htab)
> +{
> +	const unsigned max_order = 4;
> +	unsigned elem_size = htab->elem_size, i;
> +	unsigned nr_entries = htab->map.max_entries;
> +	size_t left = nr_entries * elem_size;
> +
> +	htab->elems = kzalloc(nr_entries * sizeof(struct htab_elem *),
> +			      GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY);

Should this use GFP_USER (same below)?

Also, when having a large number of elements e.g. > 1Mio, should we fall
back to vzalloc()?

> +	if (!htab->elems)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&htab->page_list);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; ) {
> +		int this_order = max_order;
> +		struct page *page;
> +		int j, to_do;
> +		void *p;
> +
> +		while (left < order_to_size(this_order - 1) && this_order)
> +			this_order--;
> +
> +		do {
> +			page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN |
> +					   __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_ZERO,
> +					   this_order);
> +			if (page)
> +				break;
...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15 11:20 [PATCH 0/6] bpf: hash: optimization Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] bpf: hash: use atomic count Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] hlist: prepare for supporting bit spinlock Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] bpf: hash: move select_bucket() out of htab's spinlock Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] bpf: hash: convert per-hashtable lock into per-bucket bit spinlock Ming Lei
2015-12-15 22:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-12-16  2:57     ` Ming Lei
     [not found]       ` <CAHbLzkpW_seTrs+WgFqsriH5uhG4LMY_jiYC0iRQ-LAdJFiUjw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-16  6:58         ` Ming Lei
2015-12-18  6:20           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-12-26  8:58             ` Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Ming Lei
2015-12-15 23:10   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-12-15 23:42     ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-12-16  7:13     ` Ming Lei
2015-12-15 23:21   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-12-15 23:35   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-12-16  0:12     ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] bpf: hash: reorganize 'struct htab_elem' Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5670A068.3040602@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).