netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] ipv6: allow setting stable_secret mode
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:04:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <567199A2.3050305@stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64C7B1E3-1F0C-4472-91A9-9D6DE5206D6A@mork.no>

On 16.12.2015 17:56, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> 
> 
> On December 16, 2015 12:30:08 PM CET, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
>> ---
>> ip/iplink.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ip/iplink.c b/ip/iplink.c
>> index f30de86d1858a0..e824082f7d8149 100644
>> --- a/ip/iplink.c
>> +++ b/ip/iplink.c
>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ void iplink_usage(void)
>> 	fprintf(stderr, "				   [ state { auto | enable | disable} ] ]\n");
>> 	fprintf(stderr, "			  [ master DEVICE ]\n");
>> 	fprintf(stderr, "			  [ nomaster ]\n");
>> -	fprintf(stderr, "			  [ addrgenmode { eui64 | none } ]\n");
>> +	fprintf(stderr, "			  [ addrgenmode { eui64 | none | stable_secret }
>> ]\n");
>> 	fprintf(stderr, "	                  [ protodown { on | off } ]\n");
>> 	fprintf(stderr, "       ip link show [ DEVICE | group GROUP ] [up]
>> [master DEV] [type TYPE]\n");
>>
>> @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ static int get_addr_gen_mode(const char *mode)
>> 		return IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_EUI64;
>> 	if (strcasecmp(mode, "none") == 0)
>> 		return IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_NONE;
>> +	if (strcasecmp(mode, "stable_secret") == 0)
>> +		return IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_STABLE_PRIVACY;
>> 	return -1;
>> }
>>
> 
> Ah, didn't notice this before I sent my similar patch. Sorry about that.
> 
> But FWIW, I really don't like the renaming you do here. 
> If the mode is 'stable_privacy', then it should be known
> by that name here as well.

I am fine with both ways. We can take your patch as you also updated the
man page. :)

The reason why I chose stable secret in the end was to align it with the
already visible proc filename stable_secret and didn't care too much
about the internal variable names.

Thanks,
Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-16 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-16 11:30 [PATCH iproute2] ipv6: allow setting stable_secret mode Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-12-16 16:56 ` Bjørn Mork
2015-12-16 17:04   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2015-12-16 18:56 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=567199A2.3050305@stressinduktion.org \
    --to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).