From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: net, ipv6: out of bounds access in secret_stable Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:20 -0500 Message-ID: <5677FBE0.8080104@oracle.com> References: <5674AF3B.6030903@oracle.com> <5677BF37.1080500@stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , LKML , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Hannes Frederic Sowa , Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:41822 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751134AbbLUNRa (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:17:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5677BF37.1080500@stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/21/2015 03:58 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 19.12.2015 21:50, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>> Hi Hannes, >>> >>> I've hit the following out of bounds access while fuzzing on the latest -next kernel. >>> >>> This code was added in 3d1bec9932 ("ipv6: introduce secret_stable to ipv6_devconf"). >>> >>> [ 459.553655] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in strlen+0x58/0x90 at addr ffff8802ab0efb0e >>> [ 459.554953] Read of size 1 by task trinity-c91/22576 >>> [ 459.555805] page:ffffea000aac3bc0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 >>> [ 459.556899] flags: 0x26fffff80000000() >>> [ 459.557521] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected >>> [ 459.558320] CPU: 7 PID: 22576 Comm: trinity-c91 Not tainted 4.4.0-rc5-next-20151218-sasha-00021-gaba8d84-dirty #2750 >>> [ 459.559809] 0000000000000000 00000000549d0aa3 ffff8802ab0ef860 ffffffffa1042384 >>> [ 459.561036] 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffffac667cdb ffffffffa10422d9 ffff8802ab0ef848 >>> [ 459.562245] ffffffff9f6a417e 00000000549d0aa3 ffff8802ab0efb0e ffff8802ab0efb0e >>> [ 459.563429] Call Trace: >>> [ 459.563831] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:52) >>> [ 459.564623] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock (lib/dump_stack.c:27) >>> [ 459.565628] ? __dump_page (mm/debug.c:126) >>> [ 459.566538] kasan_report_error (include/linux/kasan.h:28 mm/kasan/report.c:170 mm/kasan/report.c:237) >>> [ 459.570997] __asan_report_load1_noabort (mm/kasan/report.c:277) >>> [ 459.572119] ? check_preemption_disabled (lib/smp_processor_id.c:39) >>> [ 459.573731] ? strlen (lib/string.c:481 (discriminator 1)) >>> [ 459.574646] strlen (lib/string.c:481 (discriminator 1)) >>> [ 459.575485] proc_dostring (kernel/sysctl.c:1825 kernel/sysctl.c:1906) >>> [ 459.576445] ? alloc_debug_processing (mm/slub.c:1054) >>> [ 459.577523] addrconf_sysctl_stable_secret (net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5395) >> >> Looks like we don't initialize the array on stack for write case. >> At least other callers always initialize the data for both read >> and write. >> >> Please try the attached patch. > > Your patch is right. I am surprised you need to initialize the buffer > passed down to proc_dostring so that strlen can correctly operate on it, > but f4aacea2f5d1a5 ("sysctl: allow for strict write position handling") > explains why. Can you submit formally? > > Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa And that seems to fix the issue here as well. Thanks, Sasha