From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Marc Haber <mh+netdev@zugschlus.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 route to gateway on fe80::1%eth0 when I have fe80::1%br0 locally
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:50:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5679C58C.2090308@stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151222212843.GE4424@torres.zugschlus.de>
Hi Marc,
On 22.12.2015 22:28, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> thanks for your mail.
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:15:14PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>> On 12.12.2015 20:58, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> Any hints would be appreciated.
>>
>> This sysctl should help:
>>
>> accept_ra_from_local - BOOLEAN
>> Accept RA with source-address that is found on local machine
>> if the RA is otherwise proper and able to be accepted.
>> Default is to NOT accept these as it may be an un-intended
>> network loop.
>>
>> Functional default:
>> enabled if accept_ra_from_local is enabled
>> on a specific interface.
>> disabled if accept_ra_from_local is disabled
>> on a specific interface.
>>
>> Anyway, this has to be fixed up in a clean way and should work by default.
>
> The clean way would be:
>
> accept_ra_from_local=0: never accept RA with source-address that is
> found on local machine
> accept_ra_from_local=1: always accept RA with source-address that is
> found on local machine. Dangerous.
> accept_ra_from_local=2: only accept RA with link local source-address
> that is found on local machine, and not if received RA points to an
> address that is locally configured on the same interface. Default.
>
> Shall I file a bug for this in bugzilla?
Thanks but no need to do that, I already cooked a patch and will submit
tomorrow after some testing. We don't need to enhance the sysctl,
default should be to simply check the interface too if a route with
link-local address is received.
Bye,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-22 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-12 19:58 IPv6 route to gateway on fe80::1%eth0 when I have fe80::1%br0 locally Marc Haber
2015-12-22 15:15 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-12-22 21:28 ` Marc Haber
2015-12-22 21:50 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2016-02-22 15:04 ` Marc Haber
2016-02-22 15:12 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-02-22 15:47 ` Marc Haber
2016-02-22 16:15 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-02-22 19:20 ` Marc Haber
2016-02-23 9:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-02-23 10:47 ` Marc Haber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5679C58C.2090308@stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=mh+netdev@zugschlus.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).