From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: net-rsi: Reconsider usage of variable "vap_id" in rsi_send_mgmt_pkt() Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:12:27 +0100 Message-ID: <5687E8DB.3080706@users.sourceforge.net> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5687E169.4070704@users.sourceforge.net> <5687E203.1070404@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5687E203.1070404@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello, I have taken another look at the implementation of the function "rsi_se= nd_mgmt_pkt". https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/d= rivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_pkt.c?id=3De8c58e7a5a106c3d557fccd01cd4= d1128f9bab38#n114 I find the following statement combination interesting there. =E2=80=A6 u8 vap_id =3D 0; =E2=80=A6 msg[7] |=3D cpu_to_le16(vap_id << 8); =E2=80=A6 I would appreciate a further clarification. Does a shift operation for a variable which contains zero indicate an o= pen issue? Regards, Markus