From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jhs@mojatatu.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net, sched: add clsact qdisc
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:09:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568E395F.8020504@stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160107035334.GA99020@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Hi Daniel and Alexei,
On 07.01.2016 04:53, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:00:56AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>
>> I decided to extend the sch_ingress module with clsact functionality so
>> that commonly used code can be reused, the module is being aliased with
>> sch_clsact so that it can be auto-loaded properly. Alternative would have been
>> to add a flag when initializing ingress to alter its behaviour plus aliasing
>> to a different name (as it's more than just ingress). However, the first would
>> end up, based on the flag, choosing the new/old behaviour by calling different
>> function implementations to handle each anyway, the latter would require to
>> register ingress qdisc once again under different alias. So, this really begs
>> to provide a minimal, cleaner approach to have Qdisc_ops and Qdisc_class_ops
>> by its own that share callbacks used by both.
> ...
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>
> we've been going back and forth on the design and this final approach
> presented seems to be the best, since pros outweigh the cons.
>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
One question:
With the advance in lockless qdiscs by John Fastabend, is it possible to
push the handle_egress hook further down into sched layer?
Bye,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 1:00 [PATCH net-next] net, sched: add clsact qdisc Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-06 2:40 ` Cong Wang
2016-01-07 3:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-07 10:09 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2016-01-07 11:58 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-07 14:29 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-01-07 14:42 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-01-07 15:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-07 16:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-07 16:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568E395F.8020504@stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).