netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	aduyck@mirantis.com, brouer@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: john.r.fastabend@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] drop the qdisc lock for pfifo_fast/mq
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:30:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <568EF532.4040307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <568D1344.1090602@mojatatu.com>

On 16-01-06 05:14 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> 
> Sorry for not being as responsive as i would like to be
> (theman calls and i have to go).
> This looks like a good (tc workshop) candidate discussion, if still
> active by netdev11 time.
> 
> On 15-12-30 12:50 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a first take at removing the qdisc lock on the xmit path
>> where qdiscs actually have queues of skbs. The ingress qdisc
>> which is already lockless was "easy" at least in the sense that
>> we did not need any lock-free data structures to hold skbs.
>>
> 
> I did some testing over the holidays for a netdev11 paper submission
> and the ingress qdisc side of things looks very impressive (on
> an average packet size) on a single (i7 class) cpu.
> It can handle about 3x what an egress side pktgen type test (not
> very real life) can handle. Analysis shows the lock is killing us.
> So if you are looking at low hanging fruit, the egress is
> the place to look.

So this series drops the qdisc lock which should hopefully per
some older data I have bring it on par with the ingress side. But
I need to retest this latest patch series.

> I have a pktgen change that may be useful for you - I will post
> it next time i get cycles.
> I am also a willing guinea pig (given upcoming netdev11) to do
> some perf testing ;->
> 

I typically test this by putting vlan's on top of a dev with the
qdisc I want to test and running pktgen on the vlans the entry point
of the skb is pretty much where I want it in this case.

> cheers,
> jamal
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-07 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-30 17:50 [RFC PATCH 00/12] drop the qdisc lock for pfifo_fast/mq John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] lib: array based lock free queue John Fastabend
2016-01-13 19:28   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-30 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] net: sched: free per cpu bstats John Fastabend
2016-01-04 15:21   ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-04 17:32     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-04 18:08       ` John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] net: sched: allow qdiscs to handle locking John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] net: sched: provide per cpu qstat helpers John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] net: sched: per cpu gso handlers John Fastabend
2015-12-30 20:26   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-12-30 20:42     ` John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] net: sched: support qdisc_reset on NOLOCK qdisc John Fastabend
2016-01-01  2:30   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-03 19:37     ` John Fastabend
2016-01-13 16:20   ` David Miller
2016-01-13 18:03     ` John Fastabend
2016-01-15 19:44       ` David Miller
2015-12-30 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] net: sched: qdisc_qlen for per cpu logic John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] net: sched: a dflt qdisc may be used with per cpu stats John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:54 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] net: sched: pfifo_fast use alf_queue John Fastabend
2016-01-13 16:24   ` David Miller
2016-01-13 18:18     ` John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:54 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] net: sched: helper to sum qlen John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] net: sched: add support for TCQ_F_NOLOCK subqueues to sch_mq John Fastabend
2015-12-30 17:55 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] net: sched: pfifo_fast new option to deque multiple pkts John Fastabend
2015-12-30 18:13   ` John Fastabend
2016-01-06 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] drop the qdisc lock for pfifo_fast/mq Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-01-07 23:30   ` John Fastabend [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=568EF532.4040307@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).