From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@kernel.org>
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com,
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] net: vxlan: enable local checksum offload
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:36:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56902BF8.6080004@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UcbH-BVbGxOuKx2EeX_Z5SgV8fdhDRjgoSC2eQTDjxNmQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/08/2016 01:22 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> and we don't require the remote end to validate the outer checksum.
Doesn't the UDP specification require validating a non-zero checksum on
receipt?
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-08 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 17:10 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/5] Local Checksum Offload Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/5] net: local checksum offload for encapsulation Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:22 ` David Laight
2016-01-07 17:54 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-07 18:42 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-07 22:53 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 15:32 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-08 17:30 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-07 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/5] net: enable LCO for udp_tunnel_handle_offloads() users Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] net: vxlan: enable local checksum offload Edward Cree
2016-01-08 0:15 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 15:33 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-08 3:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 15:39 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-08 18:03 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 19:40 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-08 21:22 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-08 21:36 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2016-01-08 22:07 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-11 17:24 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-11 17:55 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-11 18:27 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-11 18:43 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-07 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/5] fou: enable LCO in FOU and GUE Edward Cree
2016-01-07 18:51 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-07 19:00 ` Edward Cree
2016-01-07 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/5] Documentation/networking: add tx-offloads.txt to explain LCO Edward Cree
2016-01-07 18:58 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-11 17:05 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Rework of "net: local checksum offload for encapsulation" Alexander Duyck
2016-01-11 17:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: local checksum offload for encapsulation Alexander Duyck
2016-01-11 17:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: Add support for UDP local checksum offload as a part of tunnel segmentation Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56902BF8.6080004@hpe.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hpe.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=jesse@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).