From: roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: David Wragg <david@weave.works>,
dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net 1/2] vxlan: Relax the MTU constraint on vxlan devices
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:39:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A8F2DA.2030200@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160110102836.GD1190@pox.localdomain>
On 1/10/16, 2:28 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/09/16 at 10:39am, roopa wrote:
>> On 1/6/16, 5:33 AM, David Wragg wrote:
>>> Allow the MTU of vxlan devices without an underlying device to be set to
>>> larger values (up to a maximum based on IP packet limits and vxlan
>>> overhead).
>>>
>>> Previously, their MTUs could not be set to higher than the conventional
>>> ethernet value of 1500. This is a very arbitrary value in the context
>>> of vxlan, and prevented such vxlan devices from being able to take
>>> advantage of jumbo frames etc.
>>>
>>> The default MTU remains 1500, for compatibility.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Wragg <david@weave.works>
>>>
>> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> I have an internal patch which does the same thing and
>> was hoping to post it soon.
>> I am not using ovs. so, I am not closely following the thread on the other
>> patch in the series. But, this patch certainly stands on its own and is required.
> Agreed. In fact the issue described is not OVS specific, anyone using a
> tunnel device in metadata mode benefits form this but is also exposed
> to the MTU issue.
>
> We either create a tunnel device for each underlay device and thus
> expose the baremetal MTU into the virtual network thus allowing for
> the L3 in the virtual network to check the MTU or we will not notice
> until we hit the underlay in which the context for the ICMP is much
> less useful.
>
> I'll think about how to solve this as discussed in the other portion
> of this thread as I assume you will be interested in a fix for this as
> well.
thanks thomas, will watch the thread. for now I need this for the vxlan netdevice on
my vxlan gateway. I don't really configure a default dst.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 13:33 [PATCH net 0/2] vxlan: Set a large MTU on ovs-created vxlan devices David Wragg
2016-01-06 13:33 ` [PATCH net 2/2] " David Wragg
[not found] ` <1452087186-12926-3-git-send-email-david-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 11:36 ` Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <1452087186-12926-1-git-send-email-david-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-06 13:33 ` [PATCH net 1/2] vxlan: Relax the MTU constraint on " David Wragg
[not found] ` <1452087186-12926-2-git-send-email-david-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 11:24 ` Thomas Graf
2016-01-07 11:31 ` David Wragg
2016-01-07 11:50 ` Thomas Graf
2016-01-09 18:39 ` roopa
2016-01-10 10:28 ` [ovs-dev] " Thomas Graf
2016-01-27 16:39 ` roopa [this message]
2016-01-06 20:59 ` [PATCH net 0/2] vxlan: Set a large MTU on ovs-created " David Miller
[not found] ` <20160106.155950.1007160228570301281.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-06 22:53 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-06 23:25 ` David Wragg
2016-01-06 23:57 ` [ovs-dev] " Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 0:14 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-01-07 0:46 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 11:49 ` Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <20160107114935.GJ32456-4EA/1caXOu0mYvmMESoHnA@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 16:35 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 17:21 ` [ovs-dev] " Thomas Graf
2016-01-07 17:50 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
[not found] ` <568EA55A.7070305-tFNcAqjVMyqKXQKiL6tip0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 18:40 ` Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <20160107184042.GB24672-4EA/1caXOu0mYvmMESoHnA@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-08 21:29 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-01-10 10:49 ` [ovs-dev] " Thomas Graf
[not found] ` <CAEh+42iWSZOyikNydU2Bs8meqYfrKfUJLDGFJ8HzQ06k64LP0g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 0:29 ` David Wragg
[not found] ` <86wprmp6z6.fsf-1SEAoVOfG6VEzL6FDj/jAg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-07 1:10 ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-07 21:47 ` David Miller
2016-01-07 23:42 ` David Wragg
2016-01-08 2:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A8F2DA.2030200@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=david@weave.works \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).