From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 net-next] ravb: Add dma queue interrupt support
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:50:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AA38C5.6070004@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127014944.GD27499@verge.net.au>
Hello.
On 01/27/2016 04:49 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@renesas.com>
Kaneko-san, with the amount of the review changes, it might make sense for
you to assume the authorship of this patch, only noting it's based on
Mizuguchi-san's work. In principle, when you change the original patch, you
should document the changes you made in the change log, above ---...
>>>> This patch supports the following interrupts.
>>>>
>>>> - One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
>>>> - One interrupt for emac
>>>> - Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx)
>>>>
>>>> This patch improve efficiency of the interrupt handler by adding the
>>>> interrupt handler corresponding to each interrupt source described
>>>> above. Additionally, it reduces the number of times of the access to
>>>> EthernetAVB IF.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@renesas.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I have tested this patch and the result seems positive.
>>
>> Tested on gen3 only I guess?
>
> Yes, that is correct.
>
>>> Please let me know if any more/different testing would help.
>>
>> Sanity testing on some gen2 SoC wouldn't hurt (if you have time).
>
> I don't believe that I have access to a gen2 board (+ extra hardware ?)
> where ravb works.
Sorry, I just forgot about that.
> If you do would it be possible for you to do a sanity test?
Yes, of course.
MBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-24 15:52 [PATCH/RFC v4 net-next] ravb: Add dma queue interrupt support Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-01-26 0:23 ` Simon Horman
2016-01-26 19:00 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-27 1:49 ` Simon Horman
2016-01-28 15:50 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2016-01-28 18:36 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 16:48 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 16:50 ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-07 17:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-08 17:19 ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-21 15:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-21 19:16 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-25 22:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 17:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 16:56 ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-07 17:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 17:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 17:18 ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56AA38C5.6070004@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ykaneko0929@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).