From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 -master 0/4] Minor BPF updates on frontend Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:22:52 +0100 Message-ID: <56B0756C.4060303@iogearbox.net> References: <20160202160745.6ff0fcaa@samsung9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:46251 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754074AbcBBJW5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 04:22:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160202160745.6ff0fcaa@samsung9> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Stephen, On 02/02/2016 06:07 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:12:25 +0100 > Daniel Borkmann wrote: > >> Couple of minor updates on tc frontend. >> >> Stephen, the patches are against iproute2 -master branch and *on top of* >> the two that are already lingering in patchwork: >> >> - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/569923/ > > Some cruft snuck into that patch so it is still in "Changes requested" As stated earlier, that patch is okay as-is. No cruft snuck in anywhere ... >> - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/571385/ > This one is applied Ok, thanks. I presume locally as it's not pushed out yet. Also replying to your answer on patch 2/4 here: Doesn't apply of course as the first dependency patch is in 'Changes Requested'. Otherwise, it applies just fine. Thanks!