From: zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>,
"gospo@cumulusnetworks.com" <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com>,
"jiri@mellanox.com" <jiri@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: bonding reports interface up with 0 Mbps
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:56:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B2BDC9.6020305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87618083B2453E4A8714035B62D6799250524233@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi, Emil
Thanks for your hard work.
With kernel 3.14, NETDEV_CHANGELOWERSTATE is not introduced. my user
still confronted
"bond_mii_monitor: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth1,
0 Mbps full duplex".
How to explain it?
Would you like to make tests with kernel 3.14?
Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
On 02/04/2016 07:10 AM, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
> We are seeing an occasional issue where the bonding driver may report interface up with 0 Mbps:
> bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth0, 0 Mbps full duplex
>
> So far in all the failed traces I have collected this happens on NETDEV_CHANGELOWERSTATE event:
>
> <...>-20533 [000] .... 81811.041241: ixgbe_service_task: eth1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
> <...>-20533 [000] .... 81811.041257: ixgbe_check_vf_rate_limit <-ixgbe_service_task
> <...>-20533 [000] .... 81811.041272: ixgbe_ping_all_vfs <-ixgbe_service_task
> kworker/u48:0-7503 [010] .... 81811.041345: ixgbe_get_stats64 <-dev_get_stats
> kworker/u48:0-7503 [010] .... 81811.041393: bond_netdev_event: eth1: event: 1b
> kworker/u48:0-7503 [010] .... 81811.041394: bond_netdev_event: eth1: IFF_SLAVE
> kworker/u48:0-7503 [010] .... 81811.041395: bond_netdev_event: eth1: slave->speed = ffffffff
> <...>-20533 [000] .... 81811.041407: ixgbe_ptp_overflow_check <-ixgbe_service_task
> kworker/u48:0-7503 [010] .... 81811.041407: bond_mii_monitor: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth1, 0 Mbps full duplex
>
> As a proof of concept I added NETDEV_CHANGELOWERSTATE in bond_slave_netdev_event() along with NETDEV_UP/CHANGE:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 56b5605..a9dac4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -3014,6 +3014,7 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long event,
> break;
> case NETDEV_UP:
> case NETDEV_CHANGE:
> + case NETDEV_CHANGELOWERSTATE:
> bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
> if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
> bond_3ad_adapter_speed_duplex_changed(slave);
>
> With this change I have not seen 0 Mbps reported by the bonding driver (around 12 hour test up to this point
> vs. 2-3 hours otherwise). Although I suppose it could also be some sort of race/timing issue with bond_mii_monitor().
>
> This test is with current bonding driver from net-next (top commit 03d84a5f83).
>
> The bond is configured as such:
>
> mode = 802.3ad
> lacp_rate = fast
> miimon = 100
> xmit_hash_policy = layer3+4
>
> I should note that the speed is reported correctly in /proc/net/bonding/bond0 once the bond0 interface is up,
> so this seems to be just an issue with the initial detection of the speed. At least from what I have seen so far.
>
> Thanks,
> Emil
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-04 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 23:10 bonding reports interface up with 0 Mbps Tantilov, Emil S
2016-02-04 2:56 ` zhuyj [this message]
2016-02-04 5:57 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-02-04 6:44 ` zhuyj
2016-02-04 15:47 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-02-04 20:19 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-02-04 20:29 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-02-05 0:07 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-02-05 0:37 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-02-05 0:43 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-02-05 5:19 ` zhuyj
2016-02-05 3:24 ` zhuyj
2016-02-05 16:43 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-02-08 16:30 ` Tantilov, Emil S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B2BDC9.6020305@gmail.com \
--to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).