* [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
@ 2015-09-17 12:46 Stefan Assmann
2016-02-05 21:24 ` [net-next] " Laine Stump
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Assmann @ 2015-09-17 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan; +Cc: netdev, davem, jeffrey.t.kirsher, sassmann
In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
igb_init_queue_configuration()
igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
igb_probe_vfs()
to
igb_probe_vfs()
igb_init_queue_configuration()
igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
crash on accessing the structure).
[ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048
[ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
[ 7.419370] PGD 0
[ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
[ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
[ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
[ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS 1.6.0 03/07/2013
[...]
[ 7.419431] Call Trace:
[ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
[ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
+ /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
+ adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
+
igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
--
2.4.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
2015-09-17 12:46 [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization Stefan Assmann
@ 2016-02-05 21:24 ` Laine Stump
2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laine Stump @ 2016-02-05 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Stefan Assmann, intel-wired-lan, davem, jeffrey.t.kirsher
Stefan,
I have an AMD 990FX system with an Intel 82576 card that could not
successfully boot with any kernel starting somewhere prior to 4.2, but
does boot properly in 4.4+. After a lot of time bisecting, I found that
this patch, when applied to kernel 4.3.0, solves the problem (applying
to 4.2.0 has no effect, so there's some other patch/patches in the
interim that were also part of the fix).
Since I don't know the details of proposing this patch for 4.3 stable,
would it be possible for you to do that?
Thanks!
The full saga of my problem and investigaton is here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg10687.html
On 09/17/2015 08:46 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
> igb_init_queue_configuration()
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
> igb_probe_vfs()
> to
> igb_probe_vfs()
> igb_init_queue_configuration()
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>
> This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
> during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
> get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
> module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
> crash on accessing the structure).
>
> [ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048
> [ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
> [ 7.419370] PGD 0
> [ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
> [ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
> [ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
> [ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS 1.6.0 03/07/2013
> [...]
> [ 7.419431] Call Trace:
> [ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
> [ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>
> Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
> igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>
> + /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
> + adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
> +
> igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
>
> igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
2016-02-05 21:24 ` [net-next] " Laine Stump
@ 2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
2016-02-10 10:26 ` Stefan Assmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Assmann @ 2016-02-05 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laine Stump, netdev; +Cc: intel-wired-lan, davem, jeffrey.t.kirsher
On 02/05/2016 10:24 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> I have an AMD 990FX system with an Intel 82576 card that could not
> successfully boot with any kernel starting somewhere prior to 4.2, but
> does boot properly in 4.4+. After a lot of time bisecting, I found that
> this patch, when applied to kernel 4.3.0, solves the problem (applying
> to 4.2.0 has no effect, so there's some other patch/patches in the
> interim that were also part of the fix).
>
> Since I don't know the details of proposing this patch for 4.3 stable,
> would it be possible for you to do that?
>
> Thanks!
Hi Laine,
I took a quick look at 4.3 and the patch you mention should be
sufficient. For 4.2 I'll have to take a closer look. I'm currently
traveling but going to get back to you early next week.
I'd like double check things before taking any action.
Thanks!
Stefan
> The full saga of my problem and investigaton is here:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg10687.html
>
>
> On 09/17/2015 08:46 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>> In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>> igb_probe_vfs()
>> to
>> igb_probe_vfs()
>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>>
>> This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
>> during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
>> get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
>> module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
>> crash on accessing the structure).
>>
>> [ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
>> at 0000000000000048
>> [ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
>> [ 7.419370] PGD 0
>> [ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>> [ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan
>> ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
>> [ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
>> [ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS
>> 1.6.0 03/07/2013
>> [...]
>> [ 7.419431] Call Trace:
>> [ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
>> [ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>>
>> Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
>> igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> @@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>
>> + /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
>> + adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
>> +
>> igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
>>
>> igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
@ 2016-02-10 10:26 ` Stefan Assmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Assmann @ 2016-02-10 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laine Stump, netdev; +Cc: intel-wired-lan, davem, jeffrey.t.kirsher
On 06.02.2016 00:13, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 10:24 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> Stefan,
>>
>> I have an AMD 990FX system with an Intel 82576 card that could not
>> successfully boot with any kernel starting somewhere prior to 4.2, but
>> does boot properly in 4.4+. After a lot of time bisecting, I found that
>> this patch, when applied to kernel 4.3.0, solves the problem (applying
>> to 4.2.0 has no effect, so there's some other patch/patches in the
>> interim that were also part of the fix).
>>
>> Since I don't know the details of proposing this patch for 4.3 stable,
>> would it be possible for you to do that?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Hi Laine,
>
> I took a quick look at 4.3 and the patch you mention should be
> sufficient. For 4.2 I'll have to take a closer look. I'm currently
> traveling but going to get back to you early next week.
>
> I'd like double check things before taking any action.
I've tried to reproduce your issue on several systems, mostly Intel
though, without success running 4.2 or 4.3. As I know you mostly care
for 4.3 (current fedora) I'd suggest to queue commit
cbfe360a1541a32e9e28f8f8ac925d2b7979d767 igb: assume MSI-X interrupts
during initialization
to 4.3-stable as it's a follow-up fix to
ceee3450b3a85db05a107d54fbea031c77d30401 igb: make sure SR-IOV init uses
the right number of queues
Dave, if you agree with that please queue the patch for 4.3-stable.
Thanks!
Stefan
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stefan
>
>> The full saga of my problem and investigaton is here:
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg10687.html
>>
>>
>> On 09/17/2015 08:46 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>>> In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
>>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>>> igb_probe_vfs()
>>> to
>>> igb_probe_vfs()
>>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>>>
>>> This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
>>> during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
>>> get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
>>> module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
>>> crash on accessing the structure).
>>>
>>> [ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
>>> at 0000000000000048
>>> [ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
>>> [ 7.419370] PGD 0
>>> [ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>>> [ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan
>>> ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
>>> [ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
>>> [ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS
>>> 1.6.0 03/07/2013
>>> [...]
>>> [ 7.419431] Call Trace:
>>> [ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
>>> [ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>>>
>>> Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
>>> igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
>>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> @@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>>> }
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>
>>> + /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
>>> + adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
>>> +
>>> igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
>>>
>>> igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
>>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-10 10:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-17 12:46 [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization Stefan Assmann
2016-02-05 21:24 ` [net-next] " Laine Stump
2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
2016-02-10 10:26 ` Stefan Assmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).