From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il
Cc: saeedm@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, galp@mellanox.com,
ogerlitz@mellanox.com, kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/8021q: Check the correct vlan filter capability
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:58:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CE7C03.2060200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160224.164814.157691299176786528.davem@davemloft.net>
On 16-02-24 01:48 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:27:16 +0200
>
>>>> Netdev features can be changed dynamically to off after vlan_vid_add
>>>> was called, thus vlan_vid_del will skip ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid and will
>>>> leave the device driver with un-freed resources.
>>>
>>> Are you sure the fix isn't to make vlan_vid_add() check ->features instead
>>> of ->hw_features.
>>
>> This is exactly what this fix suggests, "->features" is not consistent
>> and can be turned ON/OFF between vlan_add/del which can leave the NIC
>> driver in inconsistent state !
>
> But the user changes the setting _exactly_ to control whether these
> VLAN offloads occur or not.
>
>>> Should we really be trying to add VLAN filters when the user has
>>> turned it off?
>>
>> Well, I think it is debatable, but the current implementation is not
>> consistent, especially for adding vlan 0 by default and then the user
>> disables the vlan filter, this will cause the stack to never call the
>> nic ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid for the pre added vlan 0 and vise versa call
>> kill_vid without add_vid, BUG ?
>>
>> So i think we have two options, use this patch, and always trust to
>> delegate vlan_vid_add/del to the NIC when it's HW supports it, and the
>> nic will be smart enough to know what to do with it (in case vlan
>> filter is enabled/disabled). Or, for each vlan we can remember if it
>> was added to the NIC or not so the stack will know whether to clean it
>> up or not.
>
> If automatically added VLANs are the issue, then we should specially
> mark it such that it will get forcefully removed regardless of feature
> settings.
>
I suspect the hardware driver should flush the vid list in hardware
when the feature flag is disabled and when it is enabled I guess we
would need to do something like vlan_vids_add_by_dev() and do an add
for all the upper dev vlans.
I guess with some helper functions this could be done generally in
the ethtool set_features code path by tracking down the vid list and
calling all the del and add routines for each vlan.
A bit more work but seems more correct then creating strange cases
where hw_fatures and features don't actually work as expected.
> The whole point of the separation of ->hw_features and ->features is
> to separate what the card can do from what the user wants enabled or
> not.
>
> Therefore offload operations should be triggered by ->features not
> ->hw_features.
>
> Any test on ->hw_features that is not a validation of a ->features
> change request is a BIG RED FLAG and almost always a bug.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-24 16:39 [PATCH net] net/8021q: Check the correct vlan filter capability Saeed Mahameed
2016-02-24 16:48 ` David Miller
2016-02-24 20:27 ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-02-24 20:35 ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-02-24 21:49 ` David Miller
2016-02-24 21:48 ` David Miller
2016-02-25 3:58 ` John Fastabend [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CE7C03.2060200@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=galp@mellanox.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).