From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Smith Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: restore VLANTable map control Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 22:12:28 +0000 Message-ID: <56D0CDCD.2040806@elecsyscorp.com> References: <1456510568-13679-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <1456510568-13679-8-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <56D0B964.4090002@elecsyscorp.com> <20160226210419.GA1560@lunn.ch> <87d1rj6tlo.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel@savoirfairelinux.com" , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Sergei Shtylyov , Guenter Roeck , Neil Armstrong , Sascha Hauer , Russell King To: Vivien Didelot , Andrew Lunn Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87d1rj6tlo.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <5EBAF73B792B1640B3CB60A9D2B96579@dciincorporated.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Vivien, Andrew, On 02/26/2016 03:37 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Here, 5 is the CPU port and 6 is a DSA port. > > After joining ports 0, 1, 2 in the same bridge, we end up with: > > Port 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 > 0 - * * - - * * > 1 * - * - - * * > 2 * * - - - * * > 3 - - - - - * * > 4 - - - - - * * > 5 * * * * * - * > 6 * * * * * * - The case I am concerned about is if the switch connected over DSA in this example has a WAN port on it, which can legitimately route to the CPU on port 5 but should not route to the LAN ports 0, 1, and 2. Does this VLAN allow direct communication between the WAN and LAN? Or is this prevented by DSA or some other mechanism? Thanks, Kevin