From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, john.r.fastabend@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] net: ixgbe: Fix cls_u32 offload support for ports and fields with masks.
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:16:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DA093A.8010500@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457129413.2936.27.camel@intel.com>
On 3/4/2016 2:10 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 11:47 -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>> Fix support for 16 bit source/dest port matches in ixgbe model.
>> u32 uses a single 32-bit key value for both source and destination
>> ports
>> starting at offset 0. So replace the 2 functions with a single
>> function
>> that takes this key value/mask to program both source and dest ports.
>>
>> Remove the incorrect check for mask in ixgbe_configure_clsu32()
>>
>> Tested with the following filters:
>>
>> #tc qdisc add dev p4p1 ingress
>> #tc filter add dev p4p1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 99 \
>> handle 800:0:1 u32 ht 800: \
>> match ip dst 11.0.0.1/24 match ip src 11.0.0.2/24 action drop
>>
>> #tc filter del dev p4p1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 99 \
>> handle 800:0:1 u32
>> #tc filter add dev p4p1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 99 \
>> handle 1: u32 divisor 1
>> #tc filter add dev p4p1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 99 \
>> handle 800:0:10 u32 ht 800: link 1: \
>> offset at 0 mask 0f00 shift 6 plus 0 eat match ip protocol 6
>> ff
>> #tc filter add dev p4p1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 99 \
>> handle 1:0:10 u32 ht 1: \
>> match tcp src 1024 ffff match tcp dst 80 ffff action drop
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_model.h | 17 ++++----------
>> ---
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> Is this v2? If not, why are you re-sending a patch that is already in
> my queue? If so, where is the changelog so we know what changed in
> this updated v2 of the patch?
No. This is another patch that fixes other issues on top of the previous
one.
Thanks
Sridhar
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-04 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-04 19:47 [PATCH net-next] net: ixgbe: Fix cls_u32 offload support for ports and fields with masks Sridhar Samudrala
2016-03-04 20:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Fastabend
2016-03-04 21:27 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2016-03-04 22:10 ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-03-04 22:16 ` Samudrala, Sridhar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DA093A.8010500@intel.com \
--to=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).