From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Simek Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: macb: Fix coding style issues Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:29:39 +0100 Message-ID: <56E04F73.6030504@xilinx.com> References: <1457367460-9123-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <56DDB6CA.8000100@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: , To: Nicolas Ferre , Moritz Fischer , Michal Simek , "Cyrille Pitchen" , David Miller , Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56DDB6CA.8000100@atmel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 7.3.2016 18:13, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 07/03/2016 17:17, Moritz Fischer a =E9crit : >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> this series deals with most of the checkpatch warnings >> generated for macb. There are two BUG_ON()'s that I didn't touch, ye= t, >> that were suggested by checkpatch, that I can address in a follow up >> commit if needed. >> Let me know if you want me to split the fixes differently or squash >> them into one commit. >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I'm not usually fond of this type of patches, but I must admit that t= his > series corrects some style issues. >=20 > So, I would like more feedback from Michal and Cyrille as these chang= es > may delay some of the not-merged-yet features or more important > work-in-progress on their side. >=20 > On the other hand, if we all think it's a calm period for this macb > driver, we may find interesting to merge some "cleanup and style" > enhancements. Not a problem with merging cleanups in general. We have several out of tree patches but doesn't make sense to to wait. I wasn't in cc for the series but I don't like this change to be the part of cleanup series. mac =3D of_get_mac_address(np); if (mac) - memcpy(bp->dev->dev_addr, mac, ETH_ALEN); + ether_addr_copy(bp->dev->dev_addr, mac); else Also extending scope of variables is not the right way to go. Especiall= y when some automation tools are reporting that you should reduce scope o= f use for them. Wolfram is checking it for example. Thanks, Michal