From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: avoid copying junk bytes in bpf_get_current_comm()
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:24:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E29CDA.5010004@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457582553-395600-1-git-send-email-ast@fb.com>
On 03/10/2016 05:02 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Lots of places in the kernel use memcpy(buf, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN); but
> the result is typically passed to print("%s", buf) and extra bytes
> after zero don't cause any harm.
> In bpf the result of bpf_get_current_comm() is used as the part of
> map key and was causing spurious hash map mismatches.
> Use strlcpy() to guarantee zero-terminated string.
> bpf verifier checks that output buffer is zero-initialized,
Sorry for late reply, more below:
> so even for short task names the output buffer don't have junk bytes.
> Note it's not a security concern, since kprobe+bpf is root only.
>
> Fixes: ffeedafbf023 ("bpf: introduce current->pid, tgid, uid, gid, comm accessors")
> Reported-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index 4504ca66118d..50da680c479f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static u64 bpf_get_current_comm(u64 r1, u64 size, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
> if (!task)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - memcpy(buf, task->comm, min_t(size_t, size, sizeof(task->comm)));
> + strlcpy(buf, task->comm, min_t(size_t, size, sizeof(task->comm)));
If I see this correctly, __set_task_comm() makes sure comm is always zero
terminated, so that seems good, but isn't it already sufficient when switching
to strlcpy() to simply use:
strlcpy(buf, task->comm, size);
The min_t() seems unnecessary work to me, why do we still need it? size
is guaranteed to be > 0 through the eBPF verifier, so strlcpy() should take
care of the rest.
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-11 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-10 4:02 [PATCH net-next] bpf: avoid copying junk bytes in bpf_get_current_comm() Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-10 4:28 ` David Miller
2016-03-11 10:24 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2016-03-11 17:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-11 18:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-03-11 18:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E29CDA.5010004@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).