From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Evan Jones <ej@evanjones.ca>,
Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Subject: Re: veth regression with "don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good."
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:34:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F4BFF1.8010806@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKUBDd9TjFTvXSEL=+J02PVndNG-gcrMOpRo_MFp4J-oOnLrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/24/2016 06:44 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
> Oops, I think my last email didn't go through due to an inadvertent
> html attachment from my phone mail client.
>
> Can you send us a copy of a packet you're sending and/or confirm that
> the IP and UDP4 checksums are set correctly in the packet?
>
> If those are set right, I think we need to read through the networking
> code again to see why this is broken...
Wireshark decodes the packet as having no checksum errors.
I think the contents of the packet is correct, but the 'ip_summed'
field is set incorrectly to 'NONE' when transmitting on a raw packet
socket.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 22:01 veth regression with "don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good." Ben Greear
[not found] ` <CAKUBDd91rR7QTwCO6L6ZfRe4fuHw0L5+Zi7qm0uF018dwVGCLg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-03-24 22:57 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-24 23:56 ` Cong Wang
2016-03-25 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 1:11 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 1:13 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 1:44 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-03-25 4:34 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2016-03-25 4:41 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-03-25 4:45 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-03-25 5:07 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 5:24 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-03-25 14:35 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 21:51 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-03-25 5:06 ` Cong Wang
2016-03-25 5:13 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 5:33 ` Cong Wang
2016-03-25 16:10 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 16:32 ` Cong Wang
2016-03-25 16:45 ` David Miller
2016-03-25 16:44 ` David Miller
2016-03-25 17:14 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 19:00 ` David Miller
2016-03-25 20:56 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 21:59 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-03-25 22:23 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 23:03 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-03-25 23:46 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-07 15:11 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-07 18:32 ` Ben Greear
2016-03-25 22:23 ` Cong Wang
2016-03-25 22:16 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F4BFF1.8010806@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=ej@evanjones.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vijayp@vijayp.ca \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).