From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: veth regression with =?UTF-8?B?ImRvbuKAmXQgbW9kaWZ5IGlwX3N1bQ==?= =?UTF-8?B?bWVkOyBkb2luZyBzbyB0cmVhdHMgcGFja2V0cyB3aXRoIGJhZCBjaGVja3N1bXM=?= =?UTF-8?B?IGFzIGdvb2QuIg==?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:34:57 -0700 Message-ID: <56F4BFF1.8010806@candelatech.com> References: <56F463D6.7080406@candelatech.com> <56F4810A.9060904@candelatech.com> <56F49036.8050902@candelatech.com> <56F490B2.3090603@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Cong Wang , netdev , Evan Jones , Cong Wang To: Vijay Pandurangan Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:58343 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750828AbcCYEfD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:35:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/24/2016 06:44 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote: > Oops, I think my last email didn't go through due to an inadvertent > html attachment from my phone mail client. > > Can you send us a copy of a packet you're sending and/or confirm that > the IP and UDP4 checksums are set correctly in the packet? > > If those are set right, I think we need to read through the networking > code again to see why this is broken... Wireshark decodes the packet as having no checksum errors. I think the contents of the packet is correct, but the 'ip_summed' field is set incorrectly to 'NONE' when transmitting on a raw packet socket. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com