From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
davem@davemloft.net, sasha.levin@oracle.com, jslaby@suse.cz,
mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tun, bpf: fix suspicious RCU usage in tun_{attach,detach}_filter
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:16:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FD1512.70409@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459425558.6473.229.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
On 03/31/2016 01:59 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 13:35 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> +static inline bool sock_owned_externally(const struct sock *sk)
>> +{
>> + return sk->sk_flags & (1UL << SOCK_EXTERNAL_OWNER);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Have you reinvented sock_flag(sl, SOCK_EXTERNAL_OWNER) ? ;)
>
> Anyway, using a flag for this purpose sounds overkill to me.
Right.
> Setting it is a way to 'fool' lockdep anyway...
Yep, correct, we'd be fooling the tun case, so this diff doesn't
really make it any better there.
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 0:13 [PATCH net] tun, bpf: fix suspicious RCU usage in tun_{attach,detach}_filter Daniel Borkmann
2016-03-31 1:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 5:01 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-03-31 5:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 5:22 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-03-31 5:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 11:35 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-03-31 11:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-03-31 12:16 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2016-03-31 19:21 ` David Miller
2016-03-31 19:24 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-03-31 19:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-03-31 19:48 ` David Miller
2016-03-31 19:36 ` David Miller
2016-03-31 19:48 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-03-31 19:50 ` David Miller
2016-03-31 21:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-03-31 23:31 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-03-31 12:12 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-03-31 9:15 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FD1512.70409@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).