From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Ronciak Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] eepro100: remove ID for 82556 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:18:25 -0800 Message-ID: <56a8daef05021910184ababbe5@mail.gmail.com> References: <4216C8A3.4020303@pobox.com> Reply-To: John Ronciak Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com To: Meelis Roos In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org The 82556 is not support by the e100 driver. It is a different architecture than the one started with the 82557 thru the current generation of PRO/100 controllers. On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:08:02 +0200, Meelis Roos wrote: > JG> I see the thread, but I still worry about removing the id in your patch, > JG> since the poster in the thread says that they had to -add- an ID to both > JG> e100 and eepro100 in order to perform their test. > JG> > JG> Has anyone with this PCI ID actually confirmed that eepro100 does not > JG> work for them? > > I added the PCI ID only to e100, it was already present in eepro100. > > Neither unmodified eepro100 nor pci-id-added e100 worked with this > chip so IMHO it's safe to remove this PCI ID from eepro100 too. > > -- > Meelis Roos > > -- Cheers, John