From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] dsa: Rename phys_port_mask to enabled_port_mask Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:29:13 -0700 Message-ID: <570E9E09.4000807@gmail.com> References: <1460508045-20254-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1460508045-20254-7-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , Vivien Didelot To: Andrew Lunn , David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:35623 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752005AbcDMTbS (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:31:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f196.google.com with SMTP id r187so4920938pfr.2 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:31:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1460508045-20254-7-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/04/16 17:40, Andrew Lunn wrote: > The phys in phys_port_mask suggests this mask is about PHYs. In fact, > it means physical ports. Rename to enabled_port_mask, indicating > external enabled ports of the switch, which is hopefully less > confusing. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn > Tested-by: Vivien Didelot Acked-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian