From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: (EXT) Re: (EXT) Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] PM: domains: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state()
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 09:07:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5717577.DvuYhMxLoT@steina-w> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx-fLAXnG+1S4MHJwg9t7O6jj6Mp+q25bh==C_Z1CLs-mg@mail.gmail.com>
Am Freitag, 1. Juli 2022, 09:02:22 CEST schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:02 PM Alexander Stein
>
> <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
> > Hi Saravana,
> >
> > Am Freitag, 1. Juli 2022, 02:37:14 CEST schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 5:08 AM Alexander Stein
> > >
> > > <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2022, 09:28:43 CEST schrieb Tony Lindgren:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> [700101 02:00]:
> > > > > > Now that fw_devlink=on by default and fw_devlink supports
> > > > > > "power-domains" property, the execution will never get to the
> > > > > > point
> > > > > > where driver_deferred_probe_check_state() is called before the
> > > > > > supplier
> > > > > > has probed successfully or before deferred probe timeout has
> > > > > > expired.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, delete the call and replace it with -ENODEV.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like this causes omaps to not boot in Linux next. With this
> > > > > simple-pm-bus fails to probe initially as the power-domain is not
> > > > > yet available. On platform_probe() genpd_get_from_provider() returns
> > > > > -ENOENT.
> > > > >
> > > > > Seems like other stuff is potentially broken too, any ideas on
> > > > > how to fix this?
> > > >
> > > > I think I'm hit by this as well, although I do not get a lockup.
> > > > In my case I'm using
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-tqma8mq-mba8mx.dts and probing of
> > > > 38320000.blk-ctrl fails as the power-domain is not (yet) registed.
> > >
> > > Ok, took a look.
> > >
> > > The problem is that there are two drivers for the same device and they
> > > both initialize this device.
> > >
> > > gpc: gpc@303a0000 {
> > >
> > > compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-gpc";
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > $ git grep -l "fsl,imx7d-gpc" -- drivers/
> > > drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
> > > drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
> > >
> > > IMHO, this is a bad/broken design.
> > >
> > > So what's happening is that fw_devlink will block the probe of
> > > 38320000.blk-ctrl until 303a0000.gpc is initialized. And it stops
> > > blocking the probe of 38320000.blk-ctrl as soon as the first driver
> > > initializes the device. In this case, it's the irqchip driver.
> > >
> > > I'd recommend combining these drivers into one. Something like the
> > > patch I'm attaching (sorry for the attachment, copy-paste is mangling
> > > the tabs). Can you give it a shot please?
> >
> > I tried this patch and it delayed the driver initialization (those of UART
> > as
> > well BTW). Unfortunately the driver fails the same way:
> Thanks for testing the patch!
>
> > > [ 1.125253] imx8m-blk-ctrl 38320000.blk-ctrl: error -ENODEV: failed
> > > to
> >
> > attach power domain "bus"
> >
> > More than that it even introduced some more errors:
> > > [ 0.008160] irq: no irq domain found for gpc@303a0000 !
>
> So the idea behind my change was that as long as the irqchip isn't the
> root of the irqdomain (might be using the terms incorrectly) like the
> gic, you can make it a platform driver. And I was trying to hack up a
> patch that's the equivalent of platform_irqchip_probe() (which just
> ends up eventually calling the callback you use in IRQCHIP_DECLARE().
> I probably made some mistake in the quick hack that I'm sure if
> fixable.
>
> > > [ 0.013251] Failed to map interrupt for
> > > /soc@0/bus@30400000/timer@306a0000
>
> However, this timer driver also uses TIMER_OF_DECLARE() which can't
> handle failure to get the IRQ (because it's can't -EPROBE_DEFER). So,
> this means, the timer driver inturn needs to be converted to a
> platform driver if it's supposed to work with the IRQCHIP_DECLARE()
> being converted to a platform driver.
>
> But that's a can of worms not worth opening. But then I remembered
> this simpler workaround will work and it is pretty much a variant of
> the workaround that's already in the gpc's irqchip driver to allow two
> drivers to probe the same device (people really should stop doing
> that).
>
> Can you drop my previous hack patch and try this instead please? I'm
> 99% sure this will work.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c index b9c22f764b4d..8a0e82067924 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ static int __init imx_gpcv2_irqchip_init(struct
> device_node *node,
> * later the GPC power domain driver will not be skipped.
> */
> of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
> + fwnode_dev_initialized(domain->fwnode, false);
> return 0;
> }
Just to be sure here, I tried this patch on top of next-20220701 but
unfortunately this doesn't fix the original problem either. The timer errors
are gone though.
The probe of imx8m-blk-ctrl got slightly delayed (from 0.74 to 0.90s printk
time) but results in the identical error message.
Best regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-01 7:06 [PATCH v2 0/9] deferred_probe_timeout logic clean up Saravana Kannan
2022-06-01 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] PM: domains: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Saravana Kannan
2022-06-09 11:44 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-06-09 19:29 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-21 7:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-06-21 19:34 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-22 4:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-06-22 19:09 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-23 7:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-06-23 8:21 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-27 9:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-06-30 23:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-30 23:26 ` Rob Herring
2022-06-30 23:30 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-01 5:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-07-01 6:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-07-01 8:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-01 8:26 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-01 13:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-07-12 7:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-07-13 0:49 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-13 8:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-07-01 15:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-01 19:13 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-05 8:44 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-01 7:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-23 12:08 ` Alexander Stein
2022-07-01 0:37 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-01 6:01 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-07-01 7:02 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-04 7:07 ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2022-07-05 1:24 ` (EXT) " Saravana Kannan
2022-07-06 13:02 ` Re: " Alexander Stein
2022-07-13 0:45 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-14 6:41 ` Alexander Stein
2022-07-15 22:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-01 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-01 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] pinctrl: devicetree: " Saravana Kannan
2022-06-01 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] net: mdio: " Saravana Kannan
2022-07-05 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-13 1:40 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-13 11:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-15 8:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-01 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] driver core: Add wait_for_init_devices_probe helper function Saravana Kannan
2022-06-01 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] net: ipconfig: Relax fw_devlink if we need to mount a network rootfs Saravana Kannan
2022-06-01 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] Revert "driver core: Set default deferred_probe_timeout back to 0." Saravana Kannan
2022-07-20 17:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-20 19:01 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-07-21 8:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-01 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] driver core: Set fw_devlink.strict=1 by default Saravana Kannan
2022-06-22 7:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-06-22 8:44 ` Linus Walleij
2022-06-22 10:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-22 11:18 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-06-22 19:40 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-22 20:35 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-22 22:30 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-28 13:09 ` Linus Walleij
2022-06-01 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] iommu/of: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Saravana Kannan
2022-06-01 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] driver core: Delete driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Saravana Kannan
2022-06-07 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] deferred_probe_timeout logic clean up Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-08 0:55 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-08 4:17 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-08 10:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-08 18:12 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-08 18:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-08 21:07 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-08 22:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-08 23:15 ` Saravana Kannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5717577.DvuYhMxLoT@steina-w \
--to=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).