From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>, <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Matthew Gerlach <mgerlach@opensource.altera.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] net: stmmac: socfpga: Remove re-registration of reset controller
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:52:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718E910.10409@opensource.altera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5718BEDB.4010303@denx.de>
On 04/21/2016 06:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>
>>>> if you modify the patch to call stmmac_dvr_probe() before calling
>>>> socfpga_dwmac_init(), then you would already have the reset control
>>>> information.
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that you must call socfpga_dwmac_init()
>>> before stmmac_dvr_probe() for whatever hardware-related reason. If
>>> you are absolutely certain this is not necessary, then that's just
>>> perfect and the patch can be simplified even further -- just remove
>>> the call to socfpga_dwmac_init() from probe altogether , the dwmac
>>> core code will call plat_dat->init at the end of probe .
>>>
>>> So shall we do that ? I am happy to spin V3 like that if you confirm
>>> that it's legal to do things in the aforementioned order.
>>>
>>
>> AFAICT, I don't see any reason why the socfpga_dwmac_init() has to go
>> before the stmmac_dvr_probe(). I tested this by using U-Boot to put the
>> PHY modes in the system manager into a different mode, and put the
>> ethernet IP into reset. Linux was able to use ethernet just fine with
>> the aformentioned order.
>
> Ha, the dwmac code does not call the ->init, so you have to call it from
> the socfpga-dwmac probe afterall. I will send a V3 now and do
> it just like you suggested. I will send a RFC for calling ->init and
> ->exit from the stmmac common code too.
>
Yes, I saw this too. Was going to wait until after this patch to
follow-up. Looks like you already did! Thanks!
Dinh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 0:05 [PATCH V2] net: stmmac: socfpga: Remove re-registration of reset controller Marek Vasut
2016-04-20 2:04 ` Dinh Nguyen
2016-04-20 9:04 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-20 21:17 ` Dinh Nguyen
2016-04-20 22:27 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-21 2:44 ` Dinh Nguyen
2016-04-21 11:51 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-21 14:52 ` Dinh Nguyen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5718E910.10409@opensource.altera.com \
--to=dinguyen@opensource.altera.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=mgerlach@opensource.altera.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).