From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: VInCo: fix phy reset gpio flag Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:15:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5720671C.9040406@atmel.com> References: <570BF481.9070903@cogentembedded.com> <1461666272-10107-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <20160426.131750.433048061726795876.davem@davemloft.net> <571FB305.4060304@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: , , , , , To: Sergei Shtylyov , David Miller Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:50163 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314AbcD0HP1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 03:15:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <571FB305.4060304@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 26/04/2016 20:27, Sergei Shtylyov a =E9crit : > On 04/26/2016 08:17 PM, David Miller wrote: >=20 >>> I plan to queue this patch through arm-soc for 4.7. >> >> Ok. >=20 > How about this patch going thru your net-next repo instead? > I'd like to keep the kernel bisectable... if my phylib/macb patches g= et merged=20 > earlier than this one, that board would be broken... Sergei, David, I don't think that there is a big risk for this board to be tested in the meantime as it's not widely deployed yet. And as I'm aware of the issue and basically maintaining this DT file, I think that I'll be informed if people try an unlikely arrangement of patches on this board. So either way, I'm okay. But I do think it's not worth thinking too muc= h about this case. Bye, --=20 Nicolas Ferre