From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca>,
Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Evan Jones <ej@evanjones.ca>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:59:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5720E1F0.9010203@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lsq.1461711744.699003961@decadent.org.uk>
On 04/26/2016 04:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.80-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I would be careful about this. It causes regressions when sending
PACKET_SOCKET buffers from user-space to veth devices.
There was a proposed upstream fix for the regression, but it has not gone
into the tree as far as I know.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg370436.html
Thanks,
Ben
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca>
>
> [ Upstream commit ce8c839b74e3017996fad4e1b7ba2e2625ede82f ]
>
> Packets that arrive from real hardware devices have ip_summed ==
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY if the hardware verified the checksums, or
> CHECKSUM_NONE if the packet is bad or it was unable to verify it. The
> current version of veth will replace CHECKSUM_NONE with
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, which causes corrupt packets routed from hardware to
> a veth device to be delivered to the application. This caused applications
> at Twitter to receive corrupt data when network hardware was corrupting
> packets.
>
> We believe this was added as an optimization to skip computing and
> verifying checksums for communication between containers. However, locally
> generated packets have ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, so the code as
> written does nothing for them. As far as we can tell, after removing this
> code, these packets are transmitted from one stack to another unmodified
> (tcpdump shows invalid checksums on both sides, as expected), and they are
> delivered correctly to applications. We didn’t test every possible network
> configuration, but we tried a few common ones such as bridging containers,
> using NAT between the host and a container, and routing from hardware
> devices to containers. We have effectively deployed this in production at
> Twitter (by disabling RX checksum offloading on veth devices).
>
> This code dates back to the first version of the driver, commit
> <e314dbdc1c0dc6a548ecf> ("[NET]: Virtual ethernet device driver"), so I
> suspect this bug occurred mostly because the driver API has evolved
> significantly since then. Commit <0b7967503dc97864f283a> ("net/veth: Fix
> packet checksumming") (in December 2010) fixed this for packets that get
> created locally and sent to hardware devices, by not changing
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. However, the same issue still occurs for packets coming
> in from hardware devices.
>
> Co-authored-by: Evan Jones <ej@evanjones.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Jones <ej@evanjones.ca>
> Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
> Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca>
> Acked-by: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/veth.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -126,11 +126,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_b
> stats = this_cpu_ptr(priv->stats);
> rcv_stats = this_cpu_ptr(rcv_priv->stats);
>
> - /* don't change ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, as that
> - will cause bad checksum on forwarded packets */
> - if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE &&
> - rcv->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> - skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>
> length = skb->len;
> if (dev_forward_skb(rcv, skb) != NET_RX_SUCCESS)
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <lsq.1461711744.351546278@decadent.org.uk>
2016-04-26 23:02 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good Ben Hutchings
2016-04-27 15:59 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2016-04-27 18:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-28 0:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-04-28 0:14 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-28 10:29 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2016-04-28 13:45 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 19:18 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-30 18:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-30 19:40 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 19:54 ` Tom Herbert
2016-04-30 20:59 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 21:13 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 21:29 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 21:36 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 21:52 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 22:01 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 22:43 ` Ben Greear
2016-05-01 5:30 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t " Willy Tarreau
2016-05-13 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2016-05-13 18:21 ` David Miller
2016-05-13 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 22:42 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t " Tom Herbert
2016-04-30 20:15 ` Vijay Pandurangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5720E1F0.9010203@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ej@evanjones.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vijayp@vijayp.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).