netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca>,
	Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Evan Jones <ej@evanjones.ca>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
	Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
	Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:59:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5720E1F0.9010203@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lsq.1461711744.699003961@decadent.org.uk>

On 04/26/2016 04:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.80-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

I would be careful about this.  It causes regressions when sending
PACKET_SOCKET buffers from user-space to veth devices.

There was a proposed upstream fix for the regression, but it has not gone
into the tree as far as I know.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg370436.html

Thanks,
Ben

>
> ------------------
>
> From: Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca>
>
> [ Upstream commit ce8c839b74e3017996fad4e1b7ba2e2625ede82f ]
>
> Packets that arrive from real hardware devices have ip_summed ==
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY if the hardware verified the checksums, or
> CHECKSUM_NONE if the packet is bad or it was unable to verify it. The
> current version of veth will replace CHECKSUM_NONE with
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, which causes corrupt packets routed from hardware to
> a veth device to be delivered to the application. This caused applications
> at Twitter to receive corrupt data when network hardware was corrupting
> packets.
>
> We believe this was added as an optimization to skip computing and
> verifying checksums for communication between containers. However, locally
> generated packets have ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, so the code as
> written does nothing for them. As far as we can tell, after removing this
> code, these packets are transmitted from one stack to another unmodified
> (tcpdump shows invalid checksums on both sides, as expected), and they are
> delivered correctly to applications. We didn’t test every possible network
> configuration, but we tried a few common ones such as bridging containers,
> using NAT between the host and a container, and routing from hardware
> devices to containers. We have effectively deployed this in production at
> Twitter (by disabling RX checksum offloading on veth devices).
>
> This code dates back to the first version of the driver, commit
> <e314dbdc1c0dc6a548ecf> ("[NET]: Virtual ethernet device driver"), so I
> suspect this bug occurred mostly because the driver API has evolved
> significantly since then. Commit <0b7967503dc97864f283a> ("net/veth: Fix
> packet checksumming") (in December 2010) fixed this for packets that get
> created locally and sent to hardware devices, by not changing
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. However, the same issue still occurs for packets coming
> in from hardware devices.
>
> Co-authored-by: Evan Jones <ej@evanjones.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Jones <ej@evanjones.ca>
> Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
> Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca>
> Acked-by: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/net/veth.c | 6 ------
>   1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -126,11 +126,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_b
>   	stats = this_cpu_ptr(priv->stats);
>   	rcv_stats = this_cpu_ptr(rcv_priv->stats);
>
> -	/* don't change ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, as that
> -	   will cause bad checksum on forwarded packets */
> -	if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE &&
> -	    rcv->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> -		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>
>   	length = skb->len;
>   	if (dev_forward_skb(rcv, skb) != NET_RX_SUCCESS)
>


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-27 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <lsq.1461711744.351546278@decadent.org.uk>
2016-04-26 23:02 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good Ben Hutchings
2016-04-27 15:59   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2016-04-27 18:07     ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-28  0:00       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-04-28  0:14         ` Ben Greear
2016-04-28 10:29           ` Sabrina Dubroca
2016-04-28 13:45             ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 19:18               ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-30 18:33             ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-30 19:40               ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 19:54                 ` Tom Herbert
2016-04-30 20:59                   ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 21:13                     ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 21:29                       ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 21:36                         ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 21:52                           ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 22:01                             ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 22:43                               ` Ben Greear
2016-05-01  5:30                                 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t " Willy Tarreau
2016-05-13 16:57                                   ` Ben Greear
2016-05-13 18:21                                     ` David Miller
2016-05-13 18:23                                       ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 22:42                     ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t " Tom Herbert
2016-04-30 20:15             ` Vijay Pandurangan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5720E1F0.9010203@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ej@evanjones.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vijayp@vijayp.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).