From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
arnd@arndb.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@savoirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] phylib: don't return NULL from get_phy_device()
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:47:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57213371.1020905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160427194932.GF29024@lunn.ch>
On 27/04/16 12:49, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 03:30:57PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> Hi David, All,
>>
>> Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> writes:
>>
>>> Arnd Bergmann asked that get_phy_device() returns either NULL or the error
>>> value, not both on error. Do as he said, return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) instead
>>> of NULL when the PHY ID registers read as all ones.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Index: net-next/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- net-next.orig/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>>> +++ net-next/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>>> @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ struct phy_device *get_phy_device(struct
>>>
>>> /* If the phy_id is mostly Fs, there is no device there */
>>> if ((phy_id & 0x1fffffff) == 0x1fffffff)
>>> - return NULL;
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>>
>>> return phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id, is_c45, &c45_ids);
>>> }
>
> This change is wrong, it needs reverting, or the call sights need
> fixing to expect ENODEV.
>
> The point is, the device not being there is not an error, with respect
> to the code calling this function.
>
> It gets called by mdiobus_scan()
>
> struct phy_device *mdiobus_scan(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr)
> {
> struct phy_device *phydev;
> int err;
>
> phydev = get_phy_device(bus, addr, false);
> if (IS_ERR(phydev) || phydev == NULL)
> return phydev;
>
> So before, we return NULL, if the device was not there. Now we return
> ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).
>
> This is being called by:
>
> int __mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus, struct module *owner)
> {
> struct mdio_device *mdiodev;
> ...
> for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) {
> if ((bus->phy_mask & (1 << i)) == 0) {
> struct phy_device *phydev;
>
> phydev = mdiobus_scan(bus, i);
> if (IS_ERR(phydev)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(phydev);
> goto error;
> }
> }
> }
>
> This is treating ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) as a fatal error, where as before
> IS_ERR(NULL) would be false and it would continue scanning other
> addresses on the bus.
>
> Please revert this, or fix all the callsites such that ENODEV is not a
> fatal error.
So the one you pointed out in __mdiobus_register() is definitively
needed, though I did get a different issue than Vivien's (-EBUSY vs.
-EINVAL). The get_phy_device() in drivers/of/of_mdio.c probably needs
something similar too, here is what I locally have for the moment:
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
index 499003ee8055..94a27b028dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ int __mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus, struct
module *owner)
struct phy_device *phydev;
phydev = mdiobus_scan(bus, i);
- if (IS_ERR(phydev)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(phydev) && PTR_ERR(phydev) != -ENODEV) {
err = PTR_ERR(phydev);
goto error;
}
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-24 17:23 [PATCH 0/5] Don't return NULL from get_phy_device() anymore Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-24 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] phylib: don't return NULL from get_phy_device() Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-25 19:45 ` Florian Fainelli
[not found] ` <874mamzw5q.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl>
2016-04-27 19:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-04-27 20:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-27 20:23 ` David Miller
2016-04-27 22:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 21:47 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2016-04-27 22:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 20:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-27 20:11 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-04-24 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] xgene: get_phy_device() doesn't return NULL anymore Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-25 19:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-04-24 17:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] fixed_phy: " Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-25 19:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-04-24 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] mdio_bus: " Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-25 19:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] of_mdio: " Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-24 17:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-25 19:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-04-26 19:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] Don't return NULL from get_phy_device() anymore David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57213371.1020905@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).